Verification of Zone-30-policy effect on accident reduction using propensity score matching method for multiple treatments

抄録

In this study, the effect of the Zone 30 policy on traffic accident reduction in Hyogo prefecture, Japan, was analyzed. Specifically, with the micro-districts (cho-cho-moku) of Hyogo prefecture as the analysis units, statistical verification was performed for the cross-section data of 2017, i.e., a few years after the introduction of the "30-km/h zones," using the propensity score matching method for multiple treatments. The micro-districts of Hyogo prefecture were classified into three groups: Group 1 with no 30-km/h zones, Group 2 with 30-km/h zones but without physical devices, and Group 3 with 30-km/h zones and physical devices. The primary analysis results were as follows: The number of "Killed" or "Seriously Injured" (KSI) accidents in Group 3 tended to be lower than that in Group 1, whereas there were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2. Moreover, the total number of traffic accidents in Group 3 was not less than that in Group 1. These results suggest that, at this point, designating an area as a 30-km/h zone, by itself, has negligible effect on reducing traffic accidents; conversely, such areas can effectively reduce the number of KSI accidents when combined with physical devices. In addition, as a verification method, it is empirically demonstrated that utilizing more than two groups is an effective approach for measuring the impact of traffic safety measures.

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (25)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ