Effectiveness of Handwashing with Electrolyzed Water and Its Comparison with Several Types of Handwashing Methods against Bacteria on Hands after Nursing Procedures.

DOI 被引用文献1件 参考文献16件
  • TAKESHITA AKEMI
    Graduate School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo
  • TAKAHASHI YASUKO
    Graduate School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo
  • ENDO MIYOKO
    Graduate School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo
  • SASAKI MINAKO
    Graduate School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo

この論文をさがす

抄録

To examine the antibacterial effectiveness of handwashing with electrolyzed water (EW) when everyday nursing procedures are performed, the cleansing effectiveness of washing for 10s or 30s with EW, washing with 7.5O (w/v) povidone-iodineliquid (PI-washing), washing with medicated liquid soap (mls-washing), and washing with non-antiseptic, plain liquid soap (Is-washing) was compared. When the bacterial counts from hands after nursing procedures were 103cfu/hand or greater, it was suggested that washing for 10s or 30s with EW could be expected to have the same level of washing effectiveness asthat for mis-washing or Iswashing. Compared to PI-washing, however, the survival ratios were higher. When the bacterial counts from hands were less than 103cfu/hand after nursing procedures, washing for 10s or 30s with EW was more effective than Is-washing. Furthermore, EW could keep the bacterial counts from hands as low as those after PI-washing. Based on the above results, washing with EW was as effective as mls-washing, and though slightly less effective than PI-washing, it was considered that the same level of effectiveness seen with PI-washing could be expected for relatively lightly contaminated hands after daily nursing procedures.

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (16)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ