Significant Association between Hand-Foot Syndrome and Efficacy of Capecitabine in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

  • Azuma Yuichiro
    Division of Medicinal Safety Science, National Institute of Health Sciences
  • Hata Kojiro
    Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital
  • Sai Kimie
    Division of Medicinal Safety Science, National Institute of Health Sciences
  • Udagawa Ryoko
    Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital
  • Hirakawa Akihiro
    Department of Management Science, Tokyo University of Science
  • Tohkin Masahiro
    Division of Medicinal Safety Science, National Institute of Health Sciences
  • Ryushima Yasuaki
    Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital
  • Makino Yoshinori
    Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital
  • Yokote Nobuaki
    Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital
  • Morikawa Norifumi
    Department of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University
  • Fujiwara Yasuhiro
    Department of Breast Oncology and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital
  • Saito Yoshiro
    Division of Medicinal Safety Science, National Institute of Health Sciences
  • Yamamoto Hiroshi
    Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital

Search this article

Abstract

Capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is a promising treatment for colorectal, breast and gastric cancers, but often causes hand-foot syndrome (HFS), the most common dose-limiting toxicity. The current study was conducted to investigate the relationship between HFS and efficacy of capecitabine in 98 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Possible associations between HFS and efficacy endpoints, including time-to-treatment failure (TTF), tumor response in metastatic lesions and changes in tumor markers, were investigated retrospectively using electronic medical records. The TTF of group with HFS of grade 1 and ≥2 was significantly longer than that of group with no HFS, respectively (hazard ratio (HR), 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.87 for group with grade 1; HR, 0.42, 95% CI, 0.19–0.90 for group with grade ≥2). Significantly higher disease control rates for the liver metastasis were observed in patients with HFS (grade 1 and greater) than in those without HFS (92.9 vs. 42.9%, p=0.009). Furthermore, prevention of increases in tumor marker levels (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) and National Cancer Center-Stomach-439 (NCC-ST439)) was evident in patients with HFS. This study clearly showed a significant correlation between HFS and some efficacy markers of capecitabine therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, and suggests that early dose adjustment based on severity of HFS might improve efficacy. Studies are needed to explore predictive biomarkers for HFS/efficacy, so that capecitabine therapy can be further tailored to patient response.

Journal

Citations (4)*help

See more

References(12)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top