海域メタンハイドレートガス開発の経済性及びCO2排出量評価  [in Japanese] Evaluation of Economics and CO2 Emission for Developing Offshore Methane Hydrate Deposit  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Author(s)

    • 河田 裕子 KAWATA Yuko
    • 東京大学大学院工学系研究科地球システム工学専攻 Graduate School of Engineering, Department of Geosystem Engineering, The University of Tokyo
    • 藤田 和男 FUJITA Kazuo
    • 東京大学大学院工学系研究科地球システム工学専攻 Graduate School of Engineering, Department of Geosystem Engineering, The University of Tokyo
    • 増田 昌敬 MASUDA Yoshihiro
    • 東京大学大学院工学系研究科地球システム工学専攻 Graduate School of Engineering, Department of Geosystem Engineering, The University of Tokyo
    • 松橋 隆治 MATSUHASHI Ryuji
    • 東京大学大学院新領域創成科学研究科環境学専攻 Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, Institute of Environmental Studies, The University of Tokyo

Abstract

For offshore methane hydrate deposit, we constructed a conceptual production system model incor-porated with the software named QUE$TOR, and a model for direct and indirect CO<SUB>2</SUB> emission assess-ment by reference to the induced CO<SUB>2</SUB> emission data from the 1995 inter-industry relations table for envi-ronment analysis. Based on the calculated data, we evaluated economics and CO<SUB>2</SUB> emission in the gas production from a hypothetical offshore hydrate deposit.<BR>The three production methods were evaluated: Depressurization using vertical wells; depressuriza-tion using horizontal wells; and hot-water injection using horizontal wells. The gas production cost was evaluated to be 818 and 53 Yen/Sm<SUP>3</SUP> for the depressurization method using vertical and horizontal wells respectively, and 67 Yen/Sm<SUP>3</SUP> for the hot-water injection method. In regard to CO<SUB>2</SUB> emission, the depres-surization method yielded 66.51 g-C/Mcal for the vertical-well case and 58.43 g-C/Mcal for the horizon-tal-well case. These values were lower than the reported value for LNG (69.77 g-C/Mcal). The case of hot-water injection emitted more CO<SUB>2</SUB> at 79.59 g-C/Mcal, but it was lower than the value for oil (83.63g-C /Mcal).<BR>This study demonstrated that the depressurization using horizontal wells was most promising method from economical and environmental concerns, but its production cost is much higher than the domestic natural-gas supply price. For utilizing offshore methane hydrates as an economically feasible resource, the research and development are required in the following area: (1) Completing well with a horizontal section exceeding 1, 000 m at a shallow depth under deep water; and (2) Cost reduction in off-shore well completion and production system. Moreover, gas productivity from offshore methane hydrates must be evaluated more rigorously from field production tests and simulation studies.

Journal

  • Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy

    Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy 82(4), 197-207, 2003

    The Japan Institute of Energy

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    130003825185
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • ISSN
    0916-8753
  • Data Source
    J-STAGE 
Page Top