総胆管切開後の経胆嚢管ドレナージ法とTチューブ法との比較:6年間の臨床研究

DOI

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Biliary drainage via the cystic duct with primary closure after choledochotomy verus T tube drainage: A six-year study

この論文をさがす

抄録

Three methods of choledochal drainage were compared statistically for the patients after choledochotomy during a six-year period. We used tubes through the cystic duct with primary closure of the common duct (group C, n=16), T tubes (group T, n=14), and Nelaton tubes (group N, n=16). All the seventeen preconditional factors were comparable between groups C and T, but two factors in group N were different from those in groups C and T. Patients in group C had their tubes removed and were discharged from the hospital earlier than in groups T and N (p<O.05); patients in groups C, T, and N were discharged on postoperative days 28,44, and 33, respectively. The analysis of other outcome factors supported that drainage via the cystic duct after choledochotomy is superior to T tube drainage.

収録刊行物

  • Tando

    Tando 3 (4), 414-420, 1989

    Japan Biliary Association

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ