-
- SAKAI TOMOHIRO
- Atomi University
抄録
The purpose of this paper is to show that the linguistic meaning of tautological sentences of the form X is X does not correspond to any propositional content and to propose an analysis based on Contextualism, in particular on Meaning Eliminativism, its most extreme form. On the one hand, the radical-pragmatic assumption, shared even by recent cognitive approaches, that X is X expresses a logical tautology leads to various paradoxes. On the other hand, the radical-semantic view that its interpretations cannot be fully calculated by universal principles suffers from theoretical shortcomings. I will argue that the simple fact that X is X consists of two applications of X to the same object provides the basis for the interpretation of X is X.
収録刊行物
-
- ENGLISH LINGUISTICS
-
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 29 (1), 38-68, 2012
日本英語学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205501655424
-
- NII論文ID
- 130005001737
-
- ISSN
- 18843107
- 09183701
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可