CONTEXTUALIZING TAUTOLOGIES: FROM RADICAL PRAGMATICS TO MEANING ELIMINATIVISM

抄録

The purpose of this paper is to show that the linguistic meaning of tautological sentences of the form X is X does not correspond to any propositional content and to propose an analysis based on Contextualism, in particular on Meaning Eliminativism, its most extreme form. On the one hand, the radical-pragmatic assumption, shared even by recent cognitive approaches, that X is X expresses a logical tautology leads to various paradoxes. On the other hand, the radical-semantic view that its interpretations cannot be fully calculated by universal principles suffers from theoretical shortcomings. I will argue that the simple fact that X is X consists of two applications of X to the same object provides the basis for the interpretation of X is X.

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (14)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390001205501655424
  • NII論文ID
    130005001737
  • DOI
    10.9793/elsj.29.1_38
  • ISSN
    18843107
    09183701
  • 本文言語コード
    en
  • データソース種別
    • JaLC
    • Crossref
    • CiNii Articles
    • KAKEN
  • 抄録ライセンスフラグ
    使用不可

問題の指摘

ページトップへ