LATE BREAKING CLINICAL TRIAL (JCS 2015) : Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy for Patients With Chronic Heart Failure in a Confirmatory, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study
-
- Momomura Shin-ichi
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University
-
- Seino Yoshihiko
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital
-
- Kihara Yasuki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences
-
- Adachi Hitoshi
- Division of Cardiology, Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center
-
- Yasumura Yoshio
- Cardiovascular Division, Osaka National Hospital
-
- Yokoyama Hiroyuki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
-
- Wada Hiroshi
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University
-
- Ise Takayuki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute of Health Biosciences, University of Tokushima Graduate School
-
- Tanaka Koichi
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Miyoshi Central Hospital
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy for Patients With Chronic Heart Failure in a Confirmatory, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study
この論文をさがす
抄録
Background:Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy is expected to be novel nonpharmacotherapy with hemodynamic effects on patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), but sufficient evidence has not been obtained.Methods and Results:A 24-week, open-label, randomized, controlled study was performed to confirm the cardiac function-improving effect of ASV therapy on CHF patients. At 39 institutions, 213 outpatients with CHF, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was <40% and who had mild to severe symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class: ≥II], were enrolled. After excluding 8 patients, 102 and 103 underwent ASV plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) [ASV group] and GDMT only [control group], respectively. The primary endpoint was LVEF, and the secondary endpoints were HF deterioration, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and clinical composite response (CCR: NYHA class+HF deterioration). LVEF and BNP improved significantly at completion against the baseline values in the 2 groups. However, no significant difference was found between these groups. HF deterioration tended to be suppressed. The ASV group showed a significant improvement in CCR corroborated by significant improvements in NYHA class and ADL against the control group.Conclusions:Under the present study’s conditions, ASV therapy was not superior to GDMT in the cardiac function-improving effect but showed a clinical status-improving effect, thus indicating a given level of clinical benefit. (Circ J 2015; 79: 981–990)
収録刊行物
-
- Circulation Journal
-
Circulation Journal 79 (5), 981-990, 2015
一般社団法人 日本循環器学会
- Tweet
キーワード
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205109270528
-
- NII論文ID
- 130005066288
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA11591968
-
- ISSN
- 13474820
- 13469843
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 026342542
-
- PubMed
- 25912560
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可