<b>The Needs for Research Ethics Consultation Service in Japan: A Preliminary Questionnaire Survey</b>

DOI 3 References
  • AIZAWA Kuniko
    National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • NAKADA Haruka
    National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • DOI Kaori
    National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Dokkyo Medical University School of Nursing
  • OKITA Taketoshi
    National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
  • MATSUI Kenji
    National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • <b>国内における研究倫理コンサルテーションのニーズ：予備的質問紙調査</b>

Search this article

Abstract

Background: The research ethics consultation service (RECS) is an advisory service in which bioethicists evaluate research and development projects and assist in making sure that ethical principles are upheld within the projects. It has been implemented in several clinical research institutions and programs in Japan. However, the specific demand for this service has not yet been investigated.<br>Objective: To identify the needs for RECS and its related factors among parties involved in clinical research.<br>Design: An anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey delivered on site or by post.<br>Participants: The questionnaire was administered to 144 ethics committee members and clinical research coordinators (CRC) from 78 institutions who participated in four research ethics seminars that we held in Kyoto,Tokyo and Osaka from December 2012 to January 2014.<br>Survey period: December 2013 to February 2014.<br>Measurements: Questionnaire with 11 multiple-choice questions.<br>Results: 119 of 144 participants responded (return rate 82.6%). Of the respondents, 64.7% were research ethics committee members and officials, and 26.9% were CRCs. 54.6% were affiliated with universities and colleges. Irrespective of their roles and institutions, more than 90% answered that they themselves would like to use the RECS. While 37.0% preferred an institution-based service, 22.7% favored either a district-based service or service specialized for specific type or area of research.<br>Limitations: The results obtained in this study may not be generalizable to the needs of all clinical research communities.<br>Conclusions: We propose that public RECSs should be developed at 15 or more core research institutes in Japan to provide consultations in ethics to both ethics committees and CRCs across the country.

Journal

References(3)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top