中国における国際政治研究の展開:―「中国モデル」という課題―  [in Japanese] Historical Contexts of International Politics Study in China: The Challenge of 'China Model'  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Search this Article

Author(s)

Abstract

This article traces the historical contexts of international politics study from the 19th century to the present in China, and explores the background and possibilities of 'China model.' The China model has been argued in the academic circle in China after the latter half of the 1990s, in order to interpret Chinese foreign policy more clearly and efficiently under its own historical and cultural contexts.<br>It was the 19th century when China started to make contact with the international law and diplomacy. At first, Chinese officials recognized them as tools and device to negotiate with western countries. In the beginning of the 20th century, the Chinese government utilized concepts of modern international relations,such as sovereignty, independent and mutual principle of equality and mutual benefit, to protect and maintain its existence as a nation. Such behavior was succeeded by the PRC, such as the five principles for peace. However, the PRC kept a distance with western concepts of international politics, and began to import a series of Marxist theories and concepts it from the Soviet Union. After the Cultural Revolution, the PRC gradually resumed to receive western theories and concepts of international politics.<br>Thus, the PRC basically kept the <i>basso continuo</i> of Chinese diplomacy, such as importance of sovereignty,independent and mutual principle of equality and mutual benefit, but its main theories and concepts were from Marxist studies. After new western studies were gradually imported to China, the basic situation did not change very much. After the 1990s, the so-called rising of China, it needed to interpret and explain its policy to the world more efficiently. At that time, Chinese scholars realized that it was difficult to do so by utilizing Marxism and new western studies. Therefore, many started to explore new ways, and promoted the China model with historical and cultural contexts in China to interpret its own foreign policy. However, the arguments regarding this new model were losing its objective and their bearings.

Journal

  • International Relations

    International Relations 2014(175), 175_100-175_114, 2014

    JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    130005096425
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AN0008917X
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • ISSN
    0454-2215
  • NDL Article ID
    025482942
  • NDL Call No.
    Z1-30
  • Data Source
    NDL  J-STAGE 
Page Top