科学的方法の多元性を擁護する

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • In defense of pluralism in the scientific method
  • カガクテキ ホウホウ ノ タゲンセイ オ ヨウゴ スル

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>Rather poor reliability in reproducibility, i.e., less than 40 or 30% success in replication, has been revealed not only in psychology but also in the life and medical sciences. This has been driven by the strong pressure for privatization and commercialization among the academic fields. However, maintaining high standards in reproducibility is not the only approach to realize actual scientific method. Several examples have suggested the effectiveness of a pluralistic set of methods in ethology, cultural anthropology, cognitive psychology, primatology, etc. These include qualitative, rather than quantitative approaches, i.e., historical narrative, collecting anecdotes, and anthropomorphism. Methods should be subordinate to the goal of scientific researchers, and not the other way around.</p>

収録刊行物

  • 心理学評論

    心理学評論 59 (1), 137-141, 2016

    心理学評論刊行会

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ