運命と平等

DOI Web Site Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Between Luck and Equality
  • 運命と平等--現代規範的平等論の一断面
  • ウンメイ ト ビョウドウ ゲンダイ キハンテキ ビョウドウロン ノ イチ ダンメン
  • 現代規範的平等論の一断面
  • One Dimension of Contemporary Normative Egalitarian Theory

この論文をさがす

抄録

This paper attempts to clarify the ways in which recent egalitarians have differentiated themselves by examining their core idea to neutralize the influence of different kinds of luck in distributive justice. The paper first highlights the ways in which both resourcist and welfarist egalitarians have accepted the idea of neutralizing the influence of luck in reference to the arguments of Ronald Dworkin and Richard Arneson until 1990's. Second, the paper focuses on the way in which Elizabeth Anderson criticized both of these egalitarian formulations under the labeling of “luck egalitarianism”. Finally, this paper examines the different ways in which both resourcist and welfarist responded to the objections of Anderson in reference to the recent development of Dworkin's insurance schemes and Arneson's responsibility-catering prioritarianism. The paper concludes that the idea of neutralizing the influence of luck still plays an important role in egalitarian theory today, although some important revisions are indispensable to provide for the possible objections.

収録刊行物

  • 年報政治学

    年報政治学 57 (1), 11-40,314, 2006

    日本政治学会

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ