「仏性論争」という呼称が持つ意味の範囲――「成唯識家」が定性二乗の回心向大を承認した事例から――  [in Japanese] The Extent to Which the Meaning of the Designation "The Dispute over Buddha-nature" Holds: From an Example that the <i>Cheng weishi lun</i> Group Approved that Those of Fixed Nature of the Two Vehicles Convert to the Great Vehicle  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Search this Article

Author(s)

Abstract

<p>"The Dispute over Buddha-nature" which arose at the beginning of the Tang Dynasty originated when Xuanzang, having returned from his pilgrimage to India, introduced to China the theory of the Five Natures through his translations of the <i>Yogācārabhūmi</i> and the <i>Fodi jinglun</i>. In this paper, I verify that Shenkai, Congfang, and Daoyin, who were viewed as adherents of the Chinese Weishi school by Enchin, accepted in part that those of Fixed nature of the Two Vehicles convert to the Great Vehicle. From this, I propose that the semantic domain of the designation "The Dispute over Buddha-nature" has a tendency not only to indicate those who took either "The Theory that all attain Buddhahood" or "The Theory that there are those who do not attain Buddhahood" as truth, but that it is a technical term which has a much wider range of function. The designation "The Dispute over Buddha-nature" is used also to include the understandings of those such as Shenkai, Congfang, and Daoyin.</p>

Journal

  • Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)

    Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu) 66(2), 570-575, 2018

    Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    130007556173
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AN00018579
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • ISSN
    0019-4344
  • NDL Article ID
    028893912
  • NDL Call No.
    Z9-55
  • Data Source
    NDL  J-STAGE 
Page Top