-
- MIMA Tatsuya
- 立命館大学先端総合学術研究科
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- DSM的理性とその不満
- DSMテキ リセイ ト ソノ フマン
Search this article
Abstract
<p>We analyze the paradigm of American psychiatry after the third edition of the diagnostic manual by the American Psychiatric Association published in 1980 (DSM-III), as “DSM-reason,” and summarize its history to its fifth edition (DSM-5) in 2013. In particular, by tracing the contestation over the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, we clarify what kind of conditions are relevant for generating contestation in the making/revision process of DSM. Results suggest that the contestations are partly produced by the following characteristics of DSM-reason; the majority-vote procedure in deciding diagnostic criteria, the involvement of diverse actors other than the psychiatric community who might be driven identity recognition and/or economic interest, the operational definition of psychiatric disorders which blurs the distinction between the normal and disease, and the DSM-reason’s difference from the standard biomedical model. Medicine is not an independent unified entity, but is susceptible to and dependent on diverse social power relations.</p>
Journal
-
- The Japanese Journal of Health and Medical Sociology
-
The Japanese Journal of Health and Medical Sociology 28 (2), 54-64, 2018-01-31
The Japanese Society of Health and Medical Sociology
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001288123871872
-
- NII Article ID
- 130007604462
-
- NII Book ID
- AN10421975
-
- ISSN
- 21898642
- 13430203
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 028837230
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed