Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

• Uemura Hisashi

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Tanaka Hiroe

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Mitsuno Masataka

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Yamamura Mitsuhiro

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Ryomoto Masaaki

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Sekiya Naosumi

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Sato Ayaka

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Ueda Daisuke

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

• Miyamoto Yuji

  Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine

抄録

Objective: The usefulness of abdominal duplex ultrasound (DUS) for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was evaluated. Materials and Methods: Among 286 patients who underwent EVAR between September 2007 and July 2017, 241 patients were followed up using abdominal DUS. Endoleaks were detected in 74 patients (31%), who were divided into enlarged and nonenlarged sac groups. Endoleak velocities and widths were measured using abdominal DUS every 6 months after EVAR and were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The aneurysm diameter in the nonenlarged sac group was 54.4±8.7 mm in the final follow-up. None of the patients in the nonenlarged sac group were subjected to reintervention, whereas all patients in the enlarged sac group were subjected to reintervention. The aneurysm diameter in the enlarged sac group was 62.8±8.8 mm at the time of reintervention, and the maximum endoleak flow velocities and endoleak widths were significantly higher in the enlarged sac group than in the nonenlarged sac group (p<0.05). The cutoff values on receiver operating characteristics curves for endoleak velocity and width were 83.4 cm/s and 4.0 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Follow-ups using abdominal DUS are useful after EVAR. Endoleak velocity and width measurements are important, and reintervention may be needed when these measurements exceed their cutoff values.

収録刊行物

• Annals of Vascular Diseases

  Annals of Vascular Diseases 12 (1), 30-35, 2019-03-25

  Annals of Vascular Diseases 編集委員会

キーワード

• EVAR
• endoleaks
• abdominal duplex ultrasound

詳細情報

• CRID: 1390001288140855680
• NII論文ID: 130007618828
• DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.18-00108
• ISSN: 18816428
• ISSN: 1881641X
• Web Site: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/avd/12/1/12_oa.18-00108/_pdf
• Web Site: https://search.jamas.or.jp/link/ui/2019304530
• 本文言語コード: en
• データソース種別:
  • JaLC
  • Crossref
  • CiNii Articles
• 抄録ライセンスフラグ: 使用不可