The Clinical Usefulness of the PillCam Progress Indicator for Route Selection in Double Balloon Endoscopy

DOI Web Site PubMed 参考文献29件 オープンアクセス
  • Tsuboi Akiyoshi
    Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan
  • Oka Shiro
    Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan
  • Tanaka Shinji
    Department of Endoscopy and Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Japan
  • Iio Sumio
    Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan
  • Otani Ichiro
    Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan
  • Kunihara Sayoko
    Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan
  • Chayama Kazuaki
    Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>Objective The utility of capsule endoscopy (CE) findings in the route selection for double balloon endoscopy (DBE) has not been adequately discussed. The PillCam Progress Indicator in the RAPID 6.5 software program graphically demonstrates the progress of the capsule endoscope through the small-bowel. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of the PillCam Progress Indicator in choosing the initial DBE route. </p><p>Methods We retrospectively examined 50 consecutive patients with 50 target lesions detected on both CE and DBE at Hiroshima University Hospital from January 2011 to February 2018. In this study, we selected antegrade DBE on the basis of % Capsule Progress <50% as a clinical trial. The association between the PillCam Progress Indicator data and the DBE route to the target lesion was analyzed. </p><p>Results The target lesion was reached via the initial DBE route in 96% (48/50) of cases. The cutoff values for selecting an antegrade route for DBE were 50% for % Capsule Progress and 42% for % SB Time. At the cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for route selection were 100%, 91%, 93%, and 100% for % Capsule Progress and 96%, 91%, 93%, and 95% for % SB Time. </p><p>Conclusion The PillCam Progress Indicator was useful for determining the appropriate initial DBE route. </p>

収録刊行物

  • Internal Medicine

    Internal Medicine 58 (10), 1375-1381, 2019-05-15

    一般社団法人 日本内科学会

参考文献 (29)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ