Local Agency in Development, Market, and Forest Conservation Interventions in Lao PDR’s Northern Uplands

DOI HANDLE Web Site オープンアクセス
  • Cole Robert
    Department of Geography, National University of Singapore Center for Southeast Asian Studies (CSEAS), Kyoto University
  • Brockhaus Maria
    Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki
  • Wong Grace Y.
    Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University
  • Kallio Maarit H.
    Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki Viikki Tropical Resources Institute (VITRI), University of Helsinki
  • Moeliono Moira
    Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>Themes of inclusion, empowerment, and participation are recurrent in development discourse and interventions, implying enablement of agency on the part of communities and individuals to inform and influence how policies that affect them are enacted. This article aims to contribute to debates on participation in rural development and environmental conservation, by applying a structure-agency lens to examine experiences of marginal farm households in three distinct systems of resource allocation in Lao PDR’s northern uplands—in other words, three institutional or (in)formal structures. These comprise livelihood development and poverty reduction projects, maize contract farming, and a national protected area. Drawing on qualitative data from focus group discussions and household surveys, the article explores the degree to which farmers may shape their engagement with the different systems, and ways in which agency may be enabled or disabled by this engagement. Our findings show that although some development interventions provide consultative channels for expressing needs, these are often within limited options set from afar. The market-based maize system, while in some ways agency-enabling, also entailed narrow choices and heavy dependence on external actors. The direct regulation of the protected area system meanwhile risked separating policy decisions from existing local knowledge. Our analytical approach moves beyond notions of agency commonly focused on decision-making and/or resistance, and instead revisits the structure-agency dichotomy to build a nuanced understanding of people’s lived experiences of interventions. This allows for fresh perspectives on the everyday enablement or disablement of agency, aiming to support policy that is better grounded in local realities.</p>

収録刊行物

  • Southeast Asian Studies

    Southeast Asian Studies 8 (2), 173-202, 2019-08-22

    京都大学　東南アジア地域研究研究所

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ