移動援助動作時の腰部負担評価を目的としたアセスメントツール (TAMAツール) の開発 : 上方移動版における妥当性と信頼性の検証  [in Japanese] Development of transferring art movement assessment tool (TAMA-tool) for low back load assessment : validity and reliability in the repositioning up in bed version  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Author(s)

    • 田丸 朋子 Tamaru Tomoko
    • 大阪大学大学院医学系研究科保健学専攻 Course of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate school of Medicine
    • 阿曽 洋子 Aso Yoko
    • 大阪大学大学院医学系研究科保健学専攻 Course of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate school of Medicine
    • 伊部 亜希 [他] Ibe Aki
    • 大阪大学大学院医学系研究科保健学専攻 Course of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate school of Medicine
    • 本多 容子 Honda Yoko
    • 大阪大学大学院医学系研究科保健学専攻 Course of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate school of Medicine
    • 新田 紀枝 Nitta Norie
    • 大阪大学大学院医学系研究科保健学専攻 Course of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate school of Medicine
    • 片山 恵 Katayama Megumi
    • 神戸大学大学院保健学研究科看護学専攻 Course of Nursing, Kobe University Graduate school of Health Science
    • 山本 美輪 Yamamoto Miwa
    • 藍野大学医療保健学部看護学科 Faculty of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Department of Nursing, Aino University

Abstract

<p>  The aim of the study was to construct an observation tool for assessment of the amount of the low back load during transferring patients on bed, and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the tool. The tool consists of 18 items arranged in three parts: working environment, posture stability, and movement efficiency. In validity of the experiment, 14 nurses performed repositioning up in bed to a standardized patient. Their movements were recorded, and the joint angles, distances, compressive forces (Fc) to the L5/S1 were calculated. The overall score was moderately related to the maximum and average Fc (<i>r</i> = -0.42, <i>p</i> < 0.01 and <i>r</i> = -0.52, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In reliability of the experiment, five observers checked 19 patterns of repositioning up in bed, performed by one nurse. The intraclass correlation coefficients were over 0.80 in the inter-observer reliability, and were over 0.70 in the intra-observer reliability. Therefore, the validity and reliability of this tool were satisfactory, and the results suggest that this tool is a useful test for assessing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders related to patient transfer</p>

Journal

  • Health and Behavior Sciences

    Health and Behavior Sciences 10(2), 81-91, 2012

    Health and Behavior Sciences

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    130007841714
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AA11988961
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • ISSN
    1348-0898
  • NDL Article ID
    023661756
  • NDL Call No.
    Z74-D382
  • Data Source
    NDL  J-STAGE 
Page Top