『五蘊論釈』の法処所摂色におけるスティラマティの註釈態度について  [in Japanese] Sthiramati's Commentary on the Content of <i>Dharmāyatana</i> in the <i>Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā</i>  [in Japanese]

Access this Article

Search this Article

Author(s)

Abstract

<p>This essay studies Sthiramati's view of <i>dharmāyatana</i> in the <i>Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā</i> (PSkV). Sthiramati accepts five types of <i>dharmāyatana</i>, just as does Asaṅga in the <i>Abhidharmasamuccaya</i> (AS). However, Vasubandhu explains only <i>avijñapti</i> in the <i>Pañcaskandhaka </i>(PSk). The five types of <i>dharmāyatana</i> are <i>ābhisaṅkṣepika</i>, <i>ābhyavakāśika</i>, <i>sāmādānika</i>, <i>parikalpita</i>, and <i>vaibhūtvika</i>. Among them, <i>sāmādānika</i> corresponds to <i>avijñapti</i>. Sthiramati commented on why the four types were not mentioned in PSk. First, Sthiramati commented that <i>ābhisaṅkṣepika</i> and <i>ābhyavakāśika</i> were not re-explained as <i>dharmāyatana</i> because they were not different from <i>paramāṇu</i>. Next, for <i>parikalpita</i> and <i>vaibhūtvika</i>, both are the same as <i>vijñāna</i>, so it is interpreted that it was not explained as <i>dharmāyatana</i>. Therefore, Sthiramati understands that Vasubandhu did not deny the four kinds of <i>dharmāyatana</i>, but didn't dare to explain it. There is no negative attitude toward Vasubandhu in Sthiramati's commentarial attitude in the PSkV, and this clearly shows the character of PSk as a short text (<i>saṃkṣepita</i>).</p>

Journal

  • Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)

    Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu) 68(1), 390-387, 2019

    Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies

Codes

  • NII Article ID (NAID)
    130007899248
  • NII NACSIS-CAT ID (NCID)
    AN00018579
  • Text Lang
    JPN
  • ISSN
    0019-4344
  • NDL Article ID
    030156286
  • NDL Call No.
    Z9-55
  • Data Source
    NDL  J-STAGE 
Page Top