質的研究と量的研究との融合の可能性

• 駄田井 久

  岡山大学大学院環境生命科学研究科

書誌事項

タイトル別名

• Possibility of Integrating Qualitative Research and Quantitative Research: Possibility of approaching common problems from different perspectives
• ―共通課題への異なる視点からのアプローチの可能性―

抄録

In this report, I will 1) summarize the “role of social science,” 2) discuss the approaches of “qualitative research” and “quantitative research” based on my experience, and 3) discuss the future prospects using my collaborative research as a case study. The role of social science is to conduct medical treatment for social issues. The stages can be categorized as follows: basic research to clarify the nature of the issues in the social structure and construct hypotheses, clinical research to examine the universality of the constructed hypotheses in the field and to formulate countermeasures, and epidemiological research to prove the effectiveness of the formulated countermeasures in a time series or in a large population. In addition, qualitative and quantitative research have different areas of expertise. Qualitative research is good at constructing new hypotheses, while quantitative research is good at demonstrating the universality of hypotheses based on numerical values. I was able to have a very meaningful experience by collaborating with researchers who have different research methods on a common problem. The importance and necessity of inter­disciplinary research is increasing. It is important to provide opportunities to tackle common problems with different research methods.

収録刊行物

• 農林業問題研究

  農林業問題研究 57 (1), 23-26, 2021-03-25

  地域農林経済学会

キーワード

• 社会科学
• 質的研究と量的研究
• 共同研究の必要性と可能性
• 地域農林研究

詳細情報

• CRID: 1390850490584332544
• NII論文ID: 130008009311
• DOI: 10.7310/arfe.57.23
• ISSN: 21859973
• ISSN: 03888525
• Web Site: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/arfe/57/1/57_23/_pdf
• 本文言語コード: ja
• データソース種別:
  • JaLC
  • Crossref
  • CiNii Articles
  • KAKEN
• 抄録ライセンスフラグ: 使用不可