Using Propensity Scores for Causal Inference: Pitfalls and Tips
-
- Shiba Koichiro
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
-
- Kawahara Takuya
- Clinical Research Promotion Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital
Search this article
Abstract
<p>Methods based on propensity score (PS) have become increasingly popular as a tool for causal inference. A better understanding of the relative advantages and disadvantages of the alternative analytic approaches can contribute to the optimal choice and use of a specific PS method over other methods. In this article, we provide an accessible overview of causal inference from observational data and two major PS-based methods (matching and inverse probability weighting), focusing on the underlying assumptions and decision-making processes. We then discuss common pitfalls and tips for applying the PS methods to empirical research and compare the conventional multivariable outcome regression and the two alternative PS-based methods (ie, matching and inverse probability weighting) and discuss their similarities and differences. Although we note subtle differences in causal identification assumptions, we highlight that the methods are distinct primarily in terms of the statistical modeling assumptions involved and the target population for which exposure effects are being estimated.</p>
Journal
-
- Journal of Epidemiology
-
Journal of Epidemiology 31 (8), 457-463, 2021-08-05
Japan Epidemiological Association