Incidence of Bloodstream Infections Due to <i>Candida</i> Species and In Vitro Susceptibilities of Isolates Collected from 1998 to 2000 in a Population-Based Active Surveillance Program

  • Rana A. Hajjeh
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Andre N. Sofair
    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Lee H. Harrison
    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  • G. Marshall Lyon
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Beth A. Arthington-Skaggs
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Sara A. Mirza
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Maureen Phelan
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Juliette Morgan
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Wendy Lee-Yang
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Meral A. Ciblak
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Lynette E. Benjamin
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Laurie Thomson Sanza
    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Sharon Huie
    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Siew Fah Yeo
    Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Mary E. Brandt
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • David W. Warnock
    Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

抄録

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> <jats:p> To determine the incidence of <jats:italic>Candida</jats:italic> bloodstream infections (BSI) and antifungal drug resistance, population-based active laboratory surveillance was conducted from October 1998 through September 2000 in two areas of the United States (Baltimore, Md., and the state of Connecticut; combined population, 4.7 million). A total of 1,143 cases were detected, for an average adjusted annual incidence of 10 per 100,000 population or 1.5 per 10,000 hospital days. In 28% of patients, <jats:italic>Candida</jats:italic> BSI developed prior to or on the day of admission; only 36% of patients were in an intensive care unit at the time of diagnosis. No fewer than 78% of patients had a central catheter in place at the time of diagnosis, and 50% had undergone surgery within the previous 3 months. <jats:italic>Candida albicans</jats:italic> comprised 45% of the isolates, followed by <jats:italic>C. glabrata</jats:italic> (24%), <jats:italic>C. parapsilosis</jats:italic> (13%), and <jats:italic>C. tropicalis</jats:italic> (12%). Only 1.2% of <jats:italic>C. albicans</jats:italic> isolates were resistant to fluconazole (MIC, ≥64 μg/ml), compared to 7% of <jats:italic>C. glabrata</jats:italic> isolates and 6% of <jats:italic>C. tropicalis</jats:italic> isolates. Only 0.9% of <jats:italic>C. albicans</jats:italic> isolates were resistant to itraconazole (MIC, ≥1 μg/ml), compared to 19.5% of <jats:italic>C. glabrata</jats:italic> isolates and 6% of <jats:italic>C. tropicalis</jats:italic> isolates. Only 4.3% of <jats:italic>C. albicans</jats:italic> isolates were resistant to flucytosine (MIC, ≥32 μg/ml), compared to <1% of <jats:italic>C. parapsilosis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>C. tropicalis</jats:italic> isolates and no <jats:italic>C. glabrata</jats:italic> isolates. As determined by E-test, the MICs of amphotericin B were ≥0.38 μg/ml for 10% of <jats:italic>Candida</jats:italic> isolates, ≥1 μg/ml for 1.7% of isolates, and ≥2 μg/ml for 0.4% of isolates. Our findings highlight changes in the epidemiology of <jats:italic>Candida</jats:italic> BSI in the 1990s and provide a basis upon which to conduct further studies of selected high-risk subpopulations. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (8)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ