Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness

DOI Web Site Web Site 35 Citations

Abstract

<jats:p>Fluid flow through rock joints is commonly described by the parallel plate model where the volume flow rate varies as the cube of the joint aperture. However, deviations from this model are expected because real joint surfaces are rough and contact each other at discrete points. To examine this problem further, a computer simulation of flow between rough surfaces was done. Realistic rough surfaces were generated numerically using a fractal model of surface topography. Pairs of these surfaces were placed together to form a “joint” with a random aperture distribution. Reynolds equation, which describes laminar flow between slightly nonplanar and nonparallel surfaces, was solved on the two‐dimensional aperture mesh by the finite‐difference method. The solution is the local volume flow rate through the joint. This solution was used directly in the cubic law to get the so‐called “hydraulic aperture.” For various surface roughnesses (fractal dimensions) the hydraulic aperture was compared to the mean separation of the surfaces. At large separations the surface topography has little effect. At small separations the flow is tortuous, tending to be channeled through high‐aperture regions. The parameter most affecting fluid flow through rough joints is the ratio of the mean separation between the surfaces to the root‐mean‐square surface height. This parameter describes the distance the surface asperities protrude into the fluid and accounts for most of the disagreement with the parallel plate model. Variations in the fractal dimension produce only a second‐order effect on the fluid flow. For the range of joint closures expected during elastic deformation these results show that the actual flow rate between rough surfaces is about 70–90% of that predicted by the parallel plate model.</jats:p>

Journal

Citations (35)*help

See more

Keywords

Report a problem

Back to top