ブルデューにおける界概念

DOI Web Site
  • 磯 直樹
    社会科学高等研究院ヨーロッパ社会学センター博士課程

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Pierre Bourdieu’s Concept of Field
  • ブルデューにおける界概念--理論と調査の媒介として
  • ブルデュー ニ オケル カイ ガイネン リロン ト チョウサ ノ バイカイ ト シテ
  • 理論と調査の媒介として
  • A Medium of Theory and Research

この論文をさがす

抄録

In this paper I will first introduce Bourdieu’s idea of field, a network, or configuration, of objective relations between positions. Then I will show how it integrates theory and empirical research. In the history of Sociology, the relationship between theory and empirical research has been a grand theme, and Bourdieu was committed to integrating the two throughout his career.　I will also examine the work of Blumer, an important predecessor to Bourdieu. While both his “sensitizing concept” and his “definitive concept” have limits, Bourdieu’s “open concepts” which include habitus, capital and field have more possibilities and significances than Blumer’s. The field is a social sphere which has a limit around itself and each has its own rules within. For Bourdieu, the field is considered together with habitus and capital, and also as a part of his theory of practice. The concept of field enables us to analyze social phenomena for which we have lacked a theoretical framework. We can also use the concept of field to relate and integrate differentempirical research. One example can be found in the study of social difference.　Bourdieu’s sociology makes sense in combination with the works of other sociologists because it owes so much to them. We should ask the question “Bourdieu and what else?” rather than think in terms of a dichotomy such as “Bourdieu or not.” This will lead to a productive discussion.

収録刊行物

  • ソシオロジ

    ソシオロジ 53 (1), 37-53,200, 2008

    社会学研究会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ