哲学史研究は哲学的かつ歴史的でありえるのか

DOI Web Site オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • A Normative-Historical Approach to Philosophy’s Past
  • 哲学史研究は哲学的かつ歴史的でありえるのか : 過去の主張についての規範的探求という観点からの提案
  • テツガクシ ケンキュウ ワ テツガクテキ カツ レキシテキ デ アリ エル ノ カ : カコ ノ シュチョウ ニ ツイテ ノ キハンテキ タンキュウ ト イウ カンテン カラ ノ テイアン
  • 過去の主張についての規範的探求という観点からの提案

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>It is commonplace to distinguish two different approaches to the history of philosophy. According to the first approach, the point of studying a text from philosophy’s past is to learn something philosophically important for us today from it. In contrast, the second, more history-oriented approach refuses to read the past philosophical text for the sake of one’s own philosophical interest. For proponents of this approach, the text can be understood only if it is situated in its context in a broad sense. In this discussion, it is sometimes suggested (by Richard Rorty, for instance) that the two approaches do not constitute a dilemma; we can and must do both independently of each other. This suggestion of coexistence, however, would cause a problem for the second approach. Preferring to be exempted from the question of truth in discussing a past philosopher, proponents of this approach would be forced into a distorted understanding of philosophy’s past. In order to avoid this consequence, the present paper proposes a third approach to the history of philosophy, in which we can deal with philosophy’s past historically and philosophically at the same time.</p>

収録刊行物

  • 哲学

    哲学 2017 (68), 28-44, 2017

    日本哲学会

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ