Faraday to Einstein : constructing meaning in scientific theories
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Faraday to Einstein : constructing meaning in scientific theories
(Science and philosophy, v. 1)
M. Nijhoff , Distributors for the United States and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers, c1984
- : pbk.
Available at 31 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. [179]-194
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Einstein often expressed the sentiment that "the eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility," and that science is the means through which we comprehend it. However, nearly every one - including scientists - agrees that the concepts of modem physics are quite incomprehensible: They are both unintelligible to the educated lay-person and to the scientific community itself, where there is much dispute over the interpretation of even (and especially) the most basic concepts. There is, of course, almost universal agreement that modem science quite adequately accounts for and predicts events, i. e. , that its calculations work better than those of classical physics; yet the concepts of science are supposed to be descriptive of 'the world' as well - they should enable us to comprehend it. So, it is asked, and needs tobe"asked: Has modem physics failed in an important respect? It failed with me as a physics student. I came to physics, as with most naIve students, out of a desire to know what the world is really like; in particular, to understand Einstein's conception of it. I thought I had grasped the concepts in classical mechanics, but with electrodynamics confusion set in and only increased with relativity and quantum mechanics. At that point I began even to doubt whether I had really understood the basic concepts of classical mechanics.
Table of Contents
I. The Philosophical Situation: A Critical Appraisal.- 1: The 'standard' account of meaning.- 1.1 General characterization.- 1.1 The 'double-language' view.- 2: 'Meaning variance' and 'incommensurability'.- 2.1 The 'network' view.- 2.2 Shipwrecked.- 2.3 Is there meaning after Feyerabend?.- II. The Scientific Situation: An Historical Analysis.- 3: Faraday's 'lines of force'.- 3.1 Initial conception.- 3.2 Electromagnetic rotations.- 3.3 Electromagnetic induction.- 3.4 Electrostatic induction.- 3.5 Magnetic induction.- 3.6 The aether.- 3.7 Summary: Faraday's concept of field.- 4: Maxwell's 'Newtonian aether-field'.- 4.1 The "representative lines of force".- 4.2 The method of "physical analogy".- 4.3 The "physical lines of force".- 4.4 'Mechanical' to 'dynamical'.- 4.5 Summary: Maxwell's concept of field.- 5: Lorentz' 'non-Newtonian aether-field'.- 5.1 An enigmatic scientist.- 5.2 Rapprochement.- 5.3 The immobile aether.- 5.4 Lorentz' interpretation of the 'Lorentz transformations'.- 5.5 Summary: L'ether pour toujours.- 6: Einstein's 'field'.- 6.1 Critical reflections.- 6.2 'Electromagnetic field' in the special theory.- 6.3 Introduction: The gravitational field concept.- III. The Making of Meaning: A Proposal.- 7: Meaning in scientific practice.- 7.1 Constructing the field concept.- 7.2 'Meaning schemata' and commensurability.- Notes.
by "Nielsen BookData"