On the use of input-output models for regional planning
著者
書誌事項
On the use of input-output models for regional planning
(Studies in applied regional science, v. 1)
Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, 1976
大学図書館所蔵 全33件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. [167]-170
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This book attempts to show, in a style acceptable to both academics and hurried planning executives, how simple analytic tools may be used to bridge the substantial gap between producing an input-output table and using one. In pursuing this goal, we eschew all discussions of complex programming models, for example, and concentrate on, above all, interpretation of the transactions table itself, on such common tools as multipliers, impact analysis, projections models, and self-sufficiency analysis, and on a few innovations such as income-per-employee indices, development simulators, and market analysis routines. Our primary purpose has been to show how planners, both private and public, can use regional input-output analysis quickly and to their advantage. The Georgia Interindustry Study was sponsored by the Office of Planning and Budget and the Department of Industry and Trade of the State of Georgia; their support is gratefully acknowledged. The fmal study report, of which this book represents a substantial revision, benefited enormously from the support and incisive criticisms of Dr. William W. Nash, then with the Office of Planning and Bud~t; his efforts are warmly appreciated. Many other officials in Georgia government contributed to this study, including: Louis Schneider and Kenneth P. Johnson in the' Office of PlaJ}ning and Budget; James O. Bohanan, James Butler, George Rogers, and H.W. Wiley in the Department of Industry and Trade; Joe Woodall and Corine Cross in the Department of Labor; William M. Nixon in the Department of Audits; and J .B.
目次
1. Introduction.- 1.1 Purpose.- 1.2 Significance of the Georgia Economic Model.- 1.3 Organization of this book.- 2. The Logic of Input-Output Models.- 2.1 Introduction.- 2.2 The state transactions table.- 2.3 The rationale for a model: analysis vs. description.- 2.4 Preparing the transactions table: closing with respect to households.- 2.5 The economic model.- 2.5.1 Identities: the transactions table.- 2.5.2 Technical conditions: the direct-requirements table.- 2.5.3 Equilibrium condition: supply equals demand.- 2.5.4 Solution to the systems: the total-requirements table.- 2.5.5 Summary and transition.- 2.6 Economic change in input-output models.- 2.6.1 Causes vs. consequences of change.- 2.6.2 Structural change.- 2.6.3 Changes in final demand.- 3. Constructing the Transactions Table.- 3.1 General approach.- 3.2 Local- and primary-data sources.- 3.3 Secondary-data sources.- 3.3.1 The national input-output table as an initial data base.- 3.3.2 Problems in using the national table.- 3.3.3 Adjusting for price changes.- 3.4 The estimating procedure.- 3.4.1 A schematic review of available data.- 3.4.2 The state technology matrix.- 3.4.3 Estimating regional trade patterns.- 4. Input-Output Relations in the Georgia Economy.- 4.1 Introduction.- 4.2 Final demand.- 4.2.1 Exporting industries.- 4.2.2 The economic base of Georgia.- 4.2.3 Local final demand.- 4.3 Final payments.- 4.3.1 Importing industries.- 4.3.2 Imported products.- 4.3.3 Household payments.- 4.4 Interindustry transactions.- 4.5 Income and product accounts for Georgia, 1970.- 4.6 Summary.- 5. Economic Multipliers for Georgia Industries.- 5.1 Introduction.- 5.2 The multiplier concept.- 5.2.1 A general discussion.- 5.2.2 Mathematical formulations.- 5.3 Output and employment multipliers.- 5.4 Household-income multipliers.- 5.5 Government-income multipliers.- 5.6 Industry contributions to the Georgia economy.- 6. Economic Projections.- 6.1 Introduction.- 6.2 Types of projections.- 6.3 The projection model.- 6.3.1 Review of basic techniques.- 6.3.2 Construction of the model.- 6.3.3 Basic assumptions.- 6.4 Baseline projections of the Georgia economy, 1980.- 6.4.1 Estimates of growth in exogenous demands and productivity.- 6.4.2 The aggregate projections.- 6.4.3 Industry projections.- 6.4.4 Allocation of employment projections to trade regions.- 7. Economic Intelligence.- 7.1 The strategy of development and input-output analysis.- 7.2 A self-sufficiency analysis.- 7.3 Income-per-employee index.- 7.4 Synthesis.- 7.A Mathematical appendix on skyline charts.- 8. Impact Analysis.- 8.1 Types of short-run changes.- 8.2 Trade-pattern analysis.- 8.3 Development simulators.- 8.3.1 Introduction.- 8.3.2 New-plant simulator.- 8.3.3 New-industry simulator.- 8.4 Analysis of public projects: a development highway.- 9. A Market Information System for Georgia.- 9.1 The input-output table as a market information system.- 9.2 A sample market analysis.- 9.3 Sources of data and computations for market analyses.- 9.4 Summary.- 10. Conclusions and Extensions.- 10.1 Study summary.- 10.1.1 Empirical results.- 10.1.2 Analytic results.- 10.2 Extensions of the basic regional model.- 10.2.1 An area model system.- 10.2.2 An extended projection model.- 10.2.3 An economic-ecologic system.- 10.3 Conclusion.- Appendices.- A. Income and Product Accounts for Georgia, 1970.- B. Projections of Employment Growth in Georgia: A Shift and Share Analysis (by Charles F. Floyd).- B.1 Introduction.- B.2 Shift and share methodology.- B.2.1 National growth component.- B.2.2 Industrial mix component.- B.2.3 Regional share component.- B.2.4 Net relative change.- B.3 Projection methodology.- B.4 An application of shift and share analysis: Georgia employment growth, 1950-1980.- C. Tables.- Selected References.
「Nielsen BookData」 より