Transformational syntax and model theoretic semantics : a case study in modern Irish
著者
書誌事項
Transformational syntax and model theoretic semantics : a case study in modern Irish
(Synthese language library, v. 9)
D. Reidel, c1979
- : hbk
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全80件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"This piece of work began life as a doctoral thesis written at the University of Texas between 1976 and 1978."
Bibliography: p. 248-254
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This piece of work began life as a doctoral thesis written at the University of Texas between 1976 and 1978. Now after a year in Dublin it is to become a book. Of the many people in the Department of Linguistics at Texas who shaped my interests and who helped me through the writing of the thesis, I must single out Lee Baker, Lauri Karttunen, Bill Ladusaw, Sue Schmerling and Stanley Peters for special gratitude. All of them have provided specific suggestions which have improved this work, but perhaps more .importantly they provided a uniquely stimulating and harmonious environment in which to work, and a demanding set of professional standards to live up to. To Ken Hale lowe a particular debt of gratitude - for two years of encour agement and suggestions, and particularly for a set of detailed comments on an earlier version of the book which led to many changes for the better. I also thank my friends Per-Kristian Halvorsen and Elisabet Engdahl, both of whom took the trouble to provide me with detailed criticisms and comments. In Dublin I am grateful to the School of Celtic Studies of the Institute for Advanced Studies for giving me the opportunity of teaching a seminar on many of the topics covered in the book and of exposing the material to people whose knowledge of the language is unequalled. Donal 6 Baoill and Liam Breatnach have been particularly helpful.
目次
1. Introduction.- 2. The Syntax of Relative Clauses.- 2.1. Basic Data.- 2.2. Movement or Deletion?.- 2.3. A Deletion Analysis.- 2.4. Relative Clause Binding.- 2.5. Island Constraints on Relative Deletion.- 2.6. Against the Head-Raising Analysis.- 2.7. Conclusion.- 2.8. Another Relative Clause Type.- Notes.- 3. The Syntax of Questions.- 3.1. Introduction.- 3.2. The Relation between Relatives and Constituent Questions.- 3.3. A Deletion Analysis.- 3.4. In Defence of the Deletion Analysis.- 3.5. The Internal Structure of QNP.- 3.6. Adjectival and Adverbial Questions.- 3.7. On the Status of the Category Q.- 3.8. Yes/No Questions.- 3.9. Conclusion.- 3.10. Postscript.- Notes.- 4. Indexing and the Formalization of Accessibility Constraints.- 4.1. Introduction.- 4.2. Relative Clauses and Nominal Constituent Questions.- 4.3. Deictic Pronouns.- 4.4. Cleft Sentences.- 4.5. On Formalizing the Accessibility Constraints.- 4.6. Conclusion.- Notes.- 5. The Complementizer System.- 5.1. Introduction.- 5.2. The Data.- 5.3. Further Predictions.- 5.4. Disputed Data.- Notes.- 6. Deep Structure Syntax.- 6.1. Introduction.- 6.2. Phrase Structure Rules.- 6.3. The Lexicon.- 6.4. Generating Deep Structure Trees.- Notes.- 7. Semantic Interpretation.- 7.1. Introduction.- 7.2. Type Assignment.- 7.3. Translating the Lexicon.- 7.4. Translation Rules.- 7.5. Subcategorizational and Adverbial Uses of Prepositional Phrases.- 7.6. Noun Phrases.- 7.7. Questions.- Notes.- 8. Theoretical Postscript.- 8.1. On the Universal Characterisation of Constituent Questions.- 8.2. Deep Structure vs. Surface Structure Interpretation.
「Nielsen BookData」 より