Aristotelian aporetic ontology in Islamic and Christian thinkers
著者
書誌事項
Aristotelian aporetic ontology in Islamic and Christian thinkers
（Cambridge studies in medieval life and thought / edited by G.G. Coulton, 3rd ser.,
Cambridge University Press, 1983
- pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全16件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Bibliography: p. 276-304
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This is a ground-breaking study of the consequences of a central problem in Aristotle's Metaphysics in the interpretation given to it by Islamic and Christian Aristotelian philosophers: the relationship between individuals as individuals, and individuals as instances of a universal. Father Booth begins from an examination of the factors causing the aporia in the centre of Aristotle's ontology, going on to elaborate the way in which it occurred sometimes with confused reactions among the Greek, Syrian and Arab commentators, and to note in particular the modifications to the weighting of elements in Aristotle's ontological figures (differing in detail, but in tendency the same) when his ontology was brought into the union with Platonist and other thought conventionally known as `Neoplatonism'. The discussion culminates in two chapters on the different reconciliations of the radical Aristotelian and the Neoplatonist traditions, proposed by Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas, in which the factors in the aporia have a key importance.
目次
- 1. Aristotle's aporetic ontology and the radical Aristotelian tradition
- 2. The neoplatonist interpretation of Aristotle's ontology
- 3. The Christian Aristotelian reaction of the sixth century and monotheist modifications to the neoplatonist legacy
- 4. The Arab peripatetics
- 5. Albertus Magnus: A Logico-Emanationist figure as a means of accepting peripatretic philosophy into the Christian, platonist tradition
- 6. Thomas Aquinas: The 'aufhebung' of radical Aristotelian ontology into a pseudodionysianproclean ontology of 'esse'.
「Nielsen BookData」 より
