Dialogue games : an approach to discourse analysis
著者
書誌事項
Dialogue games : an approach to discourse analysis
(Synthese language library, v. 17)
D. Reidel Pub. Co. , Sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Boston, c1983
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全97件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. 284-310
Includes indexes
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This essay constitutes yet another approach to the fields of inquiry variously known as discourse analysis, discourse grammar, text grammar, functional 1 syntax, or text linguistics. An attempt is made to develop a fairly abstract unified theoretical frame work for the description of discourse which actually helps explain concrete facts of the discourse grammar of a naturallanguage.2 This plan is reflected in the division of the study into two parts. In the first part, a semiformal framework for describing conversational discourse is developed in some detail. In the second part, this framework is applied to the functional syntax of English. The relation of the discourse grammar of Part II to the descriptive frame work of Part I can be instructively compared to the relation of Tarskian semantics to model theory. Tarski's semantics defmes a concept of truth of a sentence in a model, an independently identified construct. Analogously, my rules of discourse grammar defme a concept of appropriateness of a sentence to a given context. The task of the first Part of the essay is to characterize the relevant notion of context. Although my original statement of the problem was linguistic - how to describe the meaning, or function, of certain aspects of word order and intonation - Part I is largely an application of various methods and results of philosophical logic. The justification of the interdisciplinary approach is the simplicity and naturalness of the eventual answers to specific linguistic problems in Part II.
目次
I: Dialogue Games.- 1 / Aims of the Game.- 1. Functions of Language.- 2. Aims vs. Means.- 3. Gambling with Truth.- 4. The Maxim of Agreement.- 2 / Propositional Attitudes.- 1. Information Sets.- 2. The Problem of Logical Omniscience.- 3. Model Sets and Model Systems.- 4. Impossible Possible Worlds.- 5. Assumption Lists as 'Small Worlds'.- 6. An Example of a Dialogue Game Situation.- 7. The Aims of the Game Revisited.- 3 / Questions.- 1. Indirect Questions.- 2. Direct Questions.- 3. Answers to Search Questions.- 4. Conclusiveness.- 5. What-questions.- 6. Who-questions.- 7. Personal Identity.- 8. Descriptive vs. Demonstrative Criteria.- 9. Relative Identification.- 4 / Dialogue Game Rules.- 1. Simplest Theory of Dialogue.- 2. Relevance.- 3. Meaning Conventions.- 4. Suggestions.- 5. Suppositions.- 6. Examples of Dialogue Strategies.- 7. Rules vs. Strategies.- 8. Derived Rules.- 9. Game Rules for Questions.- 10. Answering.- 11. Logical Moves.- 12. Arguments.- 13. Replies.- 5 / Structure of Dialogue.- 1. Structure of Dialogue.- 2. Parameters of a Move.- 3. Internal Dialogues.- 4. Playing for Others.- 5. Dialogue Games.- 6. Turn-taking and Topic Hierarchy.- 6 / Logical Game Rules.- 1. Logical Game Rules.- 2. Logical Game Rules for Questions.- 3. Game Rules for Search Questions.- 4. Which-questions.- 5. Conclusiveness.- 7 / Logic of Dialogue.- 1. Consistency.- 2. Indirect Inference.- 3. Inductive Decision.- 4. Answerhood.- 5. Implied Questions.- 6. Dialogical Entailment.- 7. Conversational Implicature.- 8. Self-transparency.- 8 / Question-Answer Dialogues.- 1. Language-games vs. Speech Acts.- 2. Pleading Ignorance.- 3. Rejection of Questions.- 4. Eliciting Questions.- 5. A Three-person Dialogue.- 6. Questions Implying Ignorance.- 7. Biased Questions.- 8. Elementary Questions.- 9. Rhetorical Questions.- 10. Tag Questions.- 11. Echo Questions.- Appendix I.- Appendix II.- II: Discourse Grammar.- 1 / Discourse Grammar.- 1. Discourse Analysis and Discourse Grammar.- 2. Appropriateness, Coherence, and Cohesion.- 3. Autonomy of Discourse Grammar.- 2 / Connectives.- 1. And.- 2. Or.- 3. Inclusive or Exclusive Or.- 4. But.- 5. Applications of (D.but).- 6. Implications of (D.but).- 7. But in Dialogue.- 8. But and the Abstract Performative Hypothesis.- 9. The Logicians' But.- 10. Russian Adversative Conjunctions.- 3 / Old and New Information.- 1. Sentence Grammar vs. Functional Syntax.- 2. Stylistic Rules.- 3. Functional Definitions.- 4. Matching.- 5. Word Order.- 6. Topicalization.- 7. VP Preposing.- 8. Focus Topicalization.- 9. Other Uses of Topicalization.- 10. Functional Definitions Refined.- 11. Kuno's Classification and Japanese wa vs. ga.- 4 / Given vs. Known Information.- 1. Subordination and Thematicity.- 2. Factivity.- 3. Cleft Sentences.- 4. It-Clefts.- 5 / Aboutness.- 1. A Traditional Ambiguity in the Notion of 'Theme'.- 2. Invalid Arguments for Independence.- 3. Ab outness.- 4. Dialogue Subjects.- 5. Subject and Topic.- 6. Evidence for Dialogue Subjects: (D.subject).- 7. Evidence from Anaphora.- 8. So-called Dislocations.- 9. Right Dislocation.- 10. As for.- Notes.- Index of Names.- Index of Subjects.- Index of Rules.
「Nielsen BookData」 より