Functions and uses of disciplinary histories
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Functions and uses of disciplinary histories
(Sociology of the sciences, v. 7,
D. Reidel , Kluwer Academic Publishers [distributor], c1983
- pbk.
Available at 33 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographies and indexes
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Edward Gibbon's allegation at the beginning of his Essay on the Study of Literature (1764) that the history of empires is that of the miseries of humankind whereas the history of the sciences is that of their splendour and happiness has for a long time been accepted by professional scientists and by historians of science alike. For its practitioner, the history of a discipline displayed above all the always difficult but fmally rewarding approach to a truth which was incorporated in the discipline in its actual fonn. Looking back, it was only too easy to distinguish those who erred and heretics in the field from the few forerunners of true science. On the one hand, the traditional history of science was told as a story of hero and hero worship, on the other hand it was, paradoxically enough, the constant attempt to remind the scientist whom he should better forget. It is not surprising at all therefore that the traditional history of science was a field of only minor interest for the practitioner of a distinct scientific diSCipline or specialty and at the same time a hardly challenging task for the professional historian. Nietzsche had already described the historian of science as someone who arrives late after harvest-time: it is somebody who is only a tolerated guest at the thanksgiving dinner of the scientific community .
Table of Contents
I The Natural Sciences.- On the Relation of Physical Science to History in Late Nineteenth-Century Germany.- Re-Reading the Past from the End of Physics: Maxwell's Equations in Retrospect.- A Founder Myth in the History of Sciences? - The Lavoisier Case.- Redefinitions of a Discipline: Histories of Geology and Geological History.- The Role of Medical History in the History of Medicine in Germany.- II The Social Sciences.- On Merton's "History" and "Systematics" of Sociological Theory.- The Self-Presentation of a Discipline: History of Psychology in the United States between Pedagogy and Scholarship.- The Uses of History for the Shaping of a Field: Observations on German Psychology.- Cultural Anthropology and the Paradigm-Concept: A Brief History of their Recent Convergence.- III The Humanities.- On the Relation of Disciplinary Development and Historical Self-Presentation - the Case of Classical Philology since the End of the Eighteenth Century.- Epilogue.- Name Index.
by "Nielsen BookData"