Categorization and differentiation : a set, re-set, comparison analysis of the effects of context on person perception
著者
書誌事項
Categorization and differentiation : a set, re-set, comparison analysis of the effects of context on person perception
(Recent research in psychology)
Springer-Verlag, c1985
大学図書館所蔵 全18件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. [70]-78
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In the context of interpersonal interaction, it is possible to characterize human beings as complex sources of information. When interacting with one another, people in tentionally, as well as unintentionally, emit cues which other people can use as a basis for generating inferences and forming impressions about them. As a rule, the informa tion that one receives about another person is complex, mutable, and multidimensional. Often, it is contradictory. One of the more enduring lines of investigation in social psychology has been concerned with understanding the processes whereby people mold such diverse information into a single, unified impression. The linear approach The most influential approach to this issue in recent years has been Anderson's information integration theory (e. g. , Anderson, 1974). The goal of this approach to im pression formation is the formulation of an algebraic model which describes the relation between stimulus input charac teristics and reported judgments. According to information integration theory, a stimulus is characterized hy two parameters: scale value and weight. The scale value of a stimulus represents the perceiver's subjective response to the information on the dimension of judgment (e. g. , good-bad, light-heavy, like-dislike). The weight of a stimulus is its importance or relevance to the judgment. It is perhaps best conceptualized as the proportion that each element of a compound stimulus contributes to the overall evaluation of the compound.
目次
I. Introduction.- II. Experiment 1.- Method.- Subjects.- Design.- Stimulus materials.- Procedure.- Dependent measures.- Results.- Discussion.- III. Experiment 2.- Method.- Subjects.- Design.- Stimulus materials.- Procedure.- Dependent measures.- Results.- Discussion.- IV. General Discussion.- Appendix 1. Priming Stimuli for Experiment 1, Positive Condition.- Appendix 2. Priming Stimuli for Experiment 1, Negative Condition.- Appendix 3. Stimulus Description for Impression Formation Task for Experiments 1 and 2.- Appendix 4. Instructions for Experiment 1.- Appendix 5. Priming Task for Experiment 2, Mixed/Incomplete Condition.- Appendix 6. Priming Task for Experiment 2, Mixed/Complete Condition.- Appendix 7. Priming Task for Experiment 2, Negative/Incomplete Condition.- Appendix 8. Priming Task for Experiment 2, Negative/Complete Condition.
「Nielsen BookData」 より