Quest for the real Samoa : the Mead/Freeman controversy & beyond

書誌事項

Quest for the real Samoa : the Mead/Freeman controversy & beyond

Lowell D. Holmes ; postscript by Eleanor Leacock

Bergin & Garvey Publishers, 1987

  • : case

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 24

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Bibliography: p. 195-201

Includes index

内容説明・目次

巻冊次

ISBN 9780897891103

内容説明

Since the controversy began, Homes's restudy has been criticized by Freeman. Now Holmes has published his dissertation findings along with more recent observations on the controversy. Because he conducted the only explicit restudy of the Manu'a group, and because of his own extensive research in the islands over three decades, Holmes's Quest for the Real Samoa is worth reading. While the book will not resolve the controversy, it does provide an interesting perspective, some new data, and useful insights into the controversy. . . . Holmes concludes that Mead's work will endure, not because it was flawless or because it is a model for contemporary research, but precisely because it was pioneering and controversial. He sees the tragedy of the controversy in Freeman's almost exclusive focus on Mead, which could obscure Freeman's potential contribution to Samoan ethnography. This is where Freeman and Holmes differe fundamentally. For Freeman, the ultimate issue is the refutation of Mead's ideas on Samoan adolescence. For Holmes, it is a deeper appreciation of the possibilities of Samoan ethnography. To get beyond the Mead/Freeman controversy, it is this latter path that should be explored. American Anthropologist Holmes has a special claim to be heard, for in 1954 he did a restudy of Tau, the same village Mead had worked in 29 years before. While Mr. Holmes disagrees with her on various points, he does not find the `truth' to be midway between Mead and Mr. Freeman. His work showed the quality of Mead's Samoan research to be `remarkably high,' while Mr. Freeman's refuation was, in Mr. Holmes's opinion, both methodologically shoddy and uncorroborated by the evidence. New York Times Book Review
巻冊次

: case ISBN 9780897891622

内容説明

Mr. Holmes' study is . . . the basic stuff of competent ethnography, that combination of science and art in which the details of daily life are systematically observed, analyzed and constructed into a cultural account. . . He concludes that Margaret Mead was essentially correct in her depiction of coming of age in Samoa in 1925, concerned as she was to compare it with adolescence in the United States at that time. New York Times Book Review Thanks to Holmes' compelling review of the `great debate,' we see [all these things] more clearly because he is acting as more than just an informed guide to the facts and the issues; he is providing an insightful exposition on the nature of anthropological inquiry. Science Book & Films

目次

Preface Mead's Coming of Age Restudies: Use and Misuse The Culture of the Village of Tau--1954 Social Organization: Family and Fono Samoan Religion The Life Cycle The Factor of Change Assessing Margaret Mead Psychometric Assessment Assessing Derek Freeman Postscript Bibliography Index

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ