Infinity in the Presocratics : a bibliographical and philosophical study
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Infinity in the Presocratics : a bibliographical and philosophical study
Nijhoff, 1972
Available at 24 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. [185]-205
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Throughout the long centuries of western metaphysics the problem of the infinite has kept surfacing in different but important ways. It had confronted Greek philosophical speculation from earliest times. It appeared in the definition of the divine attributed to Thales in Diogenes Laertius (I, 36) under the description "that which has neither beginning nor end. " It was presented on the scroll of Anaximander with enough precision to allow doxographers to transmit it in the technical terminology of the unlimited (apeiron) and the indeterminate (aoriston). The respective quanti tative and qualitative implications of these terms could hardly avoid causing trouble. The formation of the words, moreover, was clearly negative or privative in bearing. Yet in the philosophical framework the notion in its earliest use meant something highly positive, signifying fruitful content for the first principle of all the things that have positive status in the universe. These tensions could not help but make themselves felt through the course of later Greek thought. In one extreme the notion of the infinite was refined in a way that left it appropriated to the Aristotelian category of quantity. In Aristotle (Phys. III 6-8) it came to appear as essentially re quiring imperfection and lack. It meant the capacity for never-ending increase. It was always potential, never completely actualized.
Table of Contents
One: Secondary Literature on Anaximander.- Ancient Sources.- Recent Studies on Anaximander.- Vlastos, Jaeger, Burch, Kraus.- Cherniss, Cornford, Matson, McDiarmid.- Hoelscher, Kirk.- Wi?niewski, Kahn.- Guazzoni Foa, Solmsen, Classen.- Paul Seligman.- Guthrie, Gottschalk.- F. M. Cleve.- Stokes, Bicknell.- Other Studies?.- Two: Anaximander and Other Ionians.- Anaximander.- Anaximenes, Xenophanes, Heraclitus.- Conclusion.- Three: Pythagoras.- J. E. Raven.- J. A. Philip.- Conclusions.- Four: the Eleatics.- Parmenides.- Burnet, Raven and Guthrie.- Joseph Owens.- Loenen.- Taran.- Conclusions.- Zeno.- Jesse De Boer.- H. N. Lee.- Conclusions.- Melissus.- Fragment 9.- Fragment 7.- Fragment 3.- Conclusions.- Five: Post-Parmenidean Philosophers.- Empedocles.- Anaxagoras.- Infinity and Matter.- Infinity and Mind.- Conclusions.- The Atomists.- Atomists and Parmenides.- Indivisibility.- Infinity.- Six: in Retrospect.- Appendix: Additional Studies on Anaximander.- Index of Topics.- Index of Passages.- Index of Names.
by "Nielsen BookData"