Mentally disordered offenders : perspectives from law and social science
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Mentally disordered offenders : perspectives from law and social science
(Perspectives in law & psychology, v. 6)
Plenum Press, c1983
Available at 9 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographies and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
In its narrowest sense, "mentally disordered offender" refers to the approximately twenty thousand persons per year in the United States who are institutionalized as not guilty by reason of insanity, incompetent to stand trial, and mentally disordered sex offenders, as well as those prisoners transferred to mental hospitals. The real importance of mentally disordered offenders, however, may not lie in this figure. Rather, it may reside in the symbolic role that mentally disordered offenders play for the rest of the legal system. The 3,140 persons residing in state institutions on an average day in 1978 as not guilty by reason of insanity (see Chapter 4), for example, are surely worthy of concern in their own right. But they represent only 1% of the 307,276 persons residing in state and federal prisons in the same period (U. S. Dept. of Justice, 1981). From a purely numeric point of view, the insanity defense truly is "much ado about little" (Pasewark & Pasewark, 1982). The central importance of understanding these persons, however, is that they serve a symbolic function in justifying the imprisonment of the other 99%. The insanity defense, as Stone (1975) has noted, is "the exception that proves the rule. " By exculpating a relatively few people from being criminally responsible for their behavior, the law inculpates all other law violators as liable for social sanction.
Table of Contents
I: Incompetency to Stand Trial.- 1. Incompetency to Stand Trial: Developments in the Law.- 2. Defendants Incompetent to Stand Trial.- II: Acquittal by Reason of Insanity.- 3. Acquittal by Reason of Insanity: Developments in the Law.- 4. Defendants Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity.- III: Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders.- 5. Special Dispositional Alternatives for Abnormal Offenders: Developments in the Law.- 6. Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders.- IV: Prison-Mental Hospital Transfers.- 7. The Transfer of Inmates to Mental Health Facilities: Developments in the Law.- 8. Prisoners Transferred to Mental Hospitals.- V: A Compendium of United States Statutes on Mentally Disordered Offenders.- 9. Mental Disability in the American Criminal Process: A Four Issue Survey.
by "Nielsen BookData"