Names, reference, and correctness in Plato's Cratylus
著者
書誌事項
Names, reference, and correctness in Plato's Cratylus
(American university studies, Series V . Philosophy ; v. 55)
P. Lang, c1989
大学図書館所蔵 全18件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. [173]-204
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The Cratylus unfolds as a confrontation between competing theses on the question of the correctness of names. Since Plato levels criticism against both theses, we are led to wonder whether Plato himself takes a position on the main issue. Dr. Palmer argues that we can discern in the Cratylus a positive statement of Plato's own views. Plato, unlike many contemporary theorists who follow Frege, does not presuppose that intensional entities such as concepts or meanings mediate the relation between a name and its nominatum. Plato believes that reality divides into discrete, natural units and that names are established, in part, to mark these non-conventional units. Plato holds (or at least assumes) that a name is correct if it successfully (and directly) picks out a real unit or entity, and if it aptly describes its nominatum.
目次
Contents: This book offers an interpretation of Plato's own views in the Cratylus on how names pick out or refer to objects. Most scholars who have written on the Cratylus believe Plato assumes that names refer to objects through the mediation of concepts or other intensional entities. DR. Palmer argues that Plato's views are most consistent with a theory of direct reference. Another distinctive feature of the present study is that it contains the most up to date and comprehensive bibliography on the Cratylus available anywhere.
「Nielsen BookData」 より