Judicial decision making, sentencing policy, and numerical guidance
著者
書誌事項
Judicial decision making, sentencing policy, and numerical guidance
(Research in criminology)
Springer-Verlag, c1989
- U.S.
- Germany
大学図書館所蔵 全11件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. [302]-311
Includes indexes
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This book describes an original, empirical study of judicial decision making. The process of determining sentences is a difficult one for judges and often unnecessarily intuitive, subjective, and complex. The present study introduces a conceptual outline and empirical technique for increasing the precision of sentencing policy, thus offering an aid to judges who sentence in the light of this policy. The primary purpose of this model of judicial decision making is to provide a framework for scaling the seriousness of any single case in relation to the facts of that case and for relating this assessment to the appropriate quantum of sentence. The validity of the model is tested and cross-validated in an archival study. This innovative research serves as an important prototype for a system of numerical guidance to judges and sentencers.
目次
One A Perspective for a Quantitative Approach to Sentencing Policy and Guidance.- 1 The Task of Describing Sentencing Policy Quantitatively.- 2 Approaches to the Development of Detailed Sentencing Statistics and Numerical Guidelines.- 3 Toward a Model of Judicial Decision Making: An Unproductive Review of Psychological Research.- Two An Archival Study of a Legal Model of Judicial Decision Making in Sentencing.- 4 A Legal Model of Judicial Decision Making.- 5 The Data Base and Data Collection.- 6 Offense Characteristics of Burglary.- 7 The Relationship Between Offense Characteristics of Burglary and Sentence.- 8 Offender Characteristics and Prior Convictions in Cases of Burglary.- 9 The Relationship Between Offender Characteristics of Burglary and Sentence.- 10 The Relationship Between Case (Offense and Offender) Characteristics of Burglary and Sentence.- 11 Toward Detailed Sentencing Statistics.- Three Sentencing Policy and Numerical Guidance as a Deliberative Process.- 12 Judicial Input Into the Model of Sentencing.- 13 The Validity of the Technique of Fictitious Cases.- 14 Multiattribute Utility Measurement and the Model of Judicial Decision Making.- 15 Scaling of Seriousness and Assessment of Weights for Offense Factors of Burglary.- 16 Coherence and the Tariff.- 17 Toward Deliberative Sentencing and Numerical Guidelines.- Appendix 1 A Sample Case in Exercise 1.- New Case.- Appendix 2 A Sample Fictitious Case in Exercise 3 and Exercise 4.- New Case.- References.- Author Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より