Catholic perspectives on medical morals : foundational issues
著者
書誌事項
Catholic perspectives on medical morals : foundational issues
(Philosophy and medicine, v. 34)
Kluwer Academic Publishers, c1989
大学図書館所蔵 全27件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Some issued with description "Kluwer the language of science" on cover
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVES AND CONTEMPORARY MEDICAL MORALS A Catholic perspective on medical morals antedates the current world wide interest in medical and biomedical ethics by many centuries[5]. Discussions about the moral status of the fetus, abortion, contraception, and sterilization can be found in the writings of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church. Teachings on various aspects of medical morals were scattered throughout the penitential books of the early medieval church and later in more formal treatises when moral theology became recog nized as a distinct discipline. Still later, medical morality was incorpor ated into the many pastoral works on medicine. Finally, in the contemporary period, works that strictly focus on medical ethics are produced by Catholic moral theologians who have special interests in matters medical. Moreover, this long tradition of teaching has been put into practice in the medical moral directives governing the operation of hospitals under Catholic sponsorship. Catholic hospitals were monitored by Ethics Committees long before such committees were recommended by the New Jersey Court in the Karen Ann Quinlan case or by the President's Commission in 1983 ([8, 9]). Underlying the Catholic moral tradition was the use of the casuistic method, which since the 17th and 18th centuries was employed by Catholic moralists to study and resolve concrete clinical ethical dilem mas. The history of casuistry is of renewed interest today when the case method has become so widely used in the current revival of interest in medical ethics[ll].
目次
I: A Prologue.- Some Basic Considerations on Moral Teaching in the Church.- II: The Philosophical Foundations.- Nature and Human Nature as the Norm in Medical Ethics.- The Human Person and Philosophy of Medicine: A Response to William A. Wallace.- Philosophical Foundations of Catholic Medical Morals (translated by E. E. Langan).- Moral Disagreements in Catholicism: A Commentary on Wallace, Schuller, and Thomasma.- III: The Theological Foundations.- "Catholic" Medical Moral Theology?.- "Theological" Medical Morality? A Response to Joseph Fuchs.- Theological Argument and Hermeneutics in Bioethics.- The Doctrinal Starting Points for Theology and Hermeneutics in Bioethics: A Response to Klaus Demmer.- A Brief History of Medical Ethics from the Roman Catholic Perspective: Comments on the Essays of Fuchs, Cahill, Demmer, and Hellwig.- IV: Pluralism within the Church.- Pluralism within the Church.- One Church, Plural Theologies.- Is Ethics One or Many?.- Can Ethics Be Contradictory?: A Response to Gerard J. Hughes, S. J..- V: Pluralism in Society.- Religious Pluralism and Social Policy: The Case of Health Care.- Consensus, Moral Witness, and Health-Care Issues: A Dialogue with J. Bryan Hehir.- Notes on a Catholic Vision of Pluralism.- A Brief Commentary on "Notes on a Catholic Vision of Pluralism".- VI: Agapeistic Medical Ethics.- The Art and Science of Medicine.- Agape and Ethics: Some Reflections on Medical Morals from a Catholic Christian Perspective.- Notes on Contributors.
「Nielsen BookData」 より