Lawyers, courts, and professionalism : the agenda for reform

Bibliographic Information

Lawyers, courts, and professionalism : the agenda for reform

Rudolph J. Gerber ; forewords by Sandra Day O'Connor, Daniel J. Meador

(Contributions in legal studies, no. 50)

Greenwood Press, 1989

Available at  / 18 libraries

Search this Book/Journal

Note

Bibliography: p. [151]-152

Includes index

Description and Table of Contents

Description

Lack of access of the poor and middle class to civil courts, suits that benefit only lawyers, litigation tactics devoted to victory rather than truth or justice, and inefficient courts are some of the issues addressed by Judge Gerber in his outspoken critical appraisal of America's legal profession and judiciary. The author suggests practical--and in some cases radical--remedies needed to make the system responsive to the public and to give substance to the ideal of equal justice for all. Gerber's criticisms of the legal profession today are far-reaching, and the self-reflection in which he asks us to engage is difficult, even uncomfortable. But it is a necessary step in the continuing efforts we all must make to ensure that our profession upholds the highest ideals of professional responsibility. Sandra Day O'Connor, Supreme Court of the United States Lack of access of the poor and middle class to civil courts, suits that benefit only lawyers, litigation tactics devoted to victory rather than truth or justice, and inefficient courts are some of the issues addressed by Judge Gerber in his outspoken critical appraisal of America's legal profession and judiciary. The author suggests practical--and in some cases radical--remedies needed to make the system responsive to the public and to give substance to the ideal of equal justice for all. Following an introductory overview of the troubled condition of our legal system, Judge Gerber considers the narrow process by which future lawyers are selected and the financial motivations that commonly inspire them to study law. He next takes a hard look at legal education, noting that the litigation model now in vogue inculcates a mentality of combat and downgrades peacemaking and negotiating skills. In a discussion of bar exams, Judge Gerber points out that these tests measure neither ethics nor competency and fail to provide for specialty licensing, for which he recommends periodic reexamination and peer review. Commenting on the complexity, confusion, delays, and extortionate costs that prevent equal access to justice, the author offers specific suggestions for streamlining court procedures and revamping the court system by managerial and procedural changes. He examines ethical abuse by courtroom litigators, contending that periodic ethical review and specialized training are needed to insure that justice is served. Concluding with a critical analysis of major competing jurisprudential theories, Judge Gerber argues that a return to natural law ideals is needed to reinspire lawyers and judges with a philosophical sense of the foundations of justice. This important new work is particularly relevant for legal educators and professionals and for courses dealing with the legal profession, legal ethics, the judiciary, and the court system.

Table of Contents

Foreword by Sandra Day O'Connor Foreword by Daniel J. Meador Preface Introduction The Aspiration and Expiration of Professionalism: Goals of Aspiring Lawyers Legal Education: Alternatives to Combat Preparedness Bar Exams and Moral Character: Inquiries Without Character Feeding the Court Dinosaur: The War of Parts Against the Whole Victory v. Truth: Litigation Ethics Conclusion Selected Bibliography Index

by "Nielsen BookData"

Related Books: 1-1 of 1

Details

Page Top