The critics' canon : standards of theatrical reviewing in America

Bibliographic Information

The critics' canon : standards of theatrical reviewing in America

Richard H. Palmer

(Contributions in drama and theatre studies, no. 26)

Greenwood Press, 1988

Search this Book/Journal
Note

Bibliography: p. [157]-161

Includes indexes

Description and Table of Contents

Description

Palmer clearly states that his purpose is to explain 1the ways of critics to theatre practitioners, the ways of theatre to inexperienced reviewers, and the dynamic convergence of theatre and critic to anyone interested in theatre.' . . . The work is a well-written `primer' for writers and it will be useful primarily to performers who object to unfavorable `criticsm' without understanding the nature and purpose of reviewing. Accessible to general readers and undergraduates. Choice Palmer begins with an examination of the theatrical review as a medium for informing and entertaining theatregoers, documenting events of artistic of community importance, and supporting theatre through critical evaluation and publicity. He next comments on how journalistic pressures affect reviewers. Citing brief examples from hundreds of reviews, the author devotes a chapter to each of the elements that needs to be covered in a review, including performers, script, direction, music, and choreography, together with stage and lighting design and other physical aspects of the production. The final chapter develops criteria for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a theatrical review, based on aesthetic standards, the cultural tastes of theatregoers, and the interests of the community. Palmer's experience as both a theatre professional and a journalist gives him an intimate understanding of the antagonism that often develops between reviewers and those who feel themselves to be the target of irresponsible criticism. His book provides a clear perspective on theatrical matters and guidelines that will help to improve standards of reviewing and create an appreciation of the essential relationship between the theatre and its critics.

Table of Contents

Introduction: The Nature and Functions of a Review Journalistic Requirements for a Theatrical Review Reviewing the Actor: Voice and Body Reviewing the Actor: Characterization Reviewing the Script Reviewing the Stage Direction Reviewing the Performing Space, Scenery, and Properties Reviewing the Lighting and Costume Design Reviewing Miscellaneous Production Aspects: Choreography, Sound, Makeup and the Audience Strengths and Weaknesses of a Theatrical Review Bibliography Index

by "Nielsen BookData"

Related Books: 1-1 of 1
Details
Page Top