The art of judging
著者
書誌事項
The art of judging
(Studies in social philosophy & policy, no. 8)
Social Philosophy and Policy Center , Transaction Books, 1987
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全5件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The single most important issue in American constitutional law is the role the Supreme Court should play in interpretation of the constitution. This issue has been a source of controversy since at least 1803, when Chief Justice John Marshall proclaimed that the Supreme Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. But public attention has been refocused by the recent debate between Attorney General Edwin Meese and Supreme Court Justice William Brennan. The Attorney General admonished the Justices to confine themselves to strict construction of the Constitution-to apply the Constitution as the framers intended. Justice Brennan rejected this as errant and arrogant because the framers had certainly not thought about the specific problems facing the country today.
目次
- 1: The Debate: How Should Justices Interpret the Constitution?
- 2: The Choice: Should Justices Act as Statesmen or as Craftsmen?
- 3: The Importance of the Choice: Does Survival of the Rule of Law Depend on the Style of Judicial Decision Making?
- 4: A Case Study in Mixed Judicial Styles of Decision Making: Can Justices Act as Both Statesmen and Craftsmen?
- 5: A Case Study in Contrasting Styles of Judicial Decision Making: How May Statesmen and Craftsmen Differ in Deciding Cases?
- 6: The Case For Craftsmanship: Why Should Justices Decide as Craftsmen?
- 7: The Case Against Statesmanship: Why Should Justices Refrain from Deciding as Statesmen?
- 8: Conclusion: How Will Craftsmen Insure the Triumph of the Rule of Law?
「Nielsen BookData」 より