Mental retardation and sterilization : a problem of competency and paternalism
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Mental retardation and sterilization : a problem of competency and paternalism
(The Hastings Center series in ethics)
Plenum Press, c1981
Available at 7 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. 195-199
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
1 This book is the product of a one-year project conducted by the Hastings Center, Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, during 1976-1977. The Behavior Control Research Group-an ongoing, interdisciplinary working group com- posed of philosophers, psychiatrists, psychologists, social sci- entists, and lawyers-met four times over the course of the year with special consultants with expertise in the field of mental retardation. At those meetings, participants gave in- formal presentations, which were followed by group discus- sion. As the project progressed, formal papers were delivered and subjected to further critical commentary. This volume, in two related parts, represents the deliberations of the group as a whole, and then offers individual papers prepared by some scholars in order to give a sense of the kind of specific arguments on which the general conclusions were based.
We undertook the project to examine: (1) questions of competence and consent; and (2) the practical implications, lThe project, entitled "Ethical Issues in the Care and Treatment of the Mildly Mentally Retarded," was supported by the EVI5T program of the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 05576-14793. Any Opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ix x PREFACE in terms of care and treatment, that evolve from differing definitions and models applied to mental retardation.
Table of Contents
I.- 1: An Awareness of Consequences.- 2: Toward a Definition of Mental Retardation.- 3: Educating the Retarded.- 4: The Competence of the Mildly Retarded.- 5: Involuntary Sterilization and the Law: A Review of Court Cases in the United States.- 6: Involuntary Sterilization and the Rights of the Mentally Retarded.- 7: Voluntary Sterilization: A Viable Alternative?.- 8: Options for the Future.- II.- 9:Distinguishing Mentally Retarded Persons from Nonretarded: A Distinction That Makes a Difference.- 10: The Bright Man's Burden: On the Right of Mere Normals to Restrict the Civil Liberties of the Mildly Mentally Retarded.- 11: Voluntary and Involuntary Sterilization: The Legal Precedents.- 12: Sterilizing the Mildly Mentally Retarded without Their Consent: The Philosophical Arguments.- Excerpts from Five Court Cases Involving Sterilization of Mentally Retarded Persons.- Case 3:In the matter of the temporary guardianship of Mary Louise Anderson.
by "Nielsen BookData"