Judicial settlement of international disputes : jurisdiction, justiciability and judicial law-making on the contemporary international court
著者
書誌事項
Judicial settlement of international disputes : jurisdiction, justiciability and judicial law-making on the contemporary international court
M. Nijhoff, c1991
大学図書館所蔵 全29件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The record of the International Court of Justice and its predecessor, the old Permanent Court of International Justice, extends back now for about three quarters of a century. During that time the Court has been transformed from a Western (Eurocentric) tribunal in terms both of its judges and also the disputes it was called on to resolve, to an institution broadly representative of the layered, pluralistic world community of today. This is reflected in the fiercely contested battles for election to the Court or the regular triennial elections, and also in the angry denunciations of the Court as a `political' tribunal rendering `political' decisions, launched by some national foreign Ministry spokesmen in reaction to Court judgments involving their own states or what they consider as their own vital interests.
Within the Court's ranks in recent years there has been a marked philosophical division between those judges (usually from Western or Western-influenced states) who have sought to maintain traditional positivist, strict construction (`neutral') approaches, and those who would in American legal Realist-style, essay a more frankly critical, liberal activist role in the up-dating or re-making of old legal doctrines inherited from earlier eras in international relations.
The intellectual-legal conflicts within the Court are canvassed in some of the major political-legal cases of recent years (South West Africa and Namibia; Nuclear Tests; Western Sahara; Nicaragua v. US).
The contemporary role of the Court and its relation to and cooperation with other principal United Nations (especially the General Assembly) organs, in World Community problem-solving, are fully explored, in terms of the potential problems but also the opportunities and challenges for the Court and its judges today in an historical era of transition and rapid change in the World Community.
目次
Foreword. I: Contemporary Conceptions of the Role of International Judicial Settlement. II: The Contemporary International Judicial Process. Law and Logic, and the `Law'/`Politics' dichotomy. III: The Jurisdiction of the Full Court of the International Court, and the Special Chambers Gloss to Jurisdiction. IV: The Contemporary International Court as Independent, and as Representative Tribunal. V: A Contemporary, Operational Approach to Court Jurisdiction and Justiciability. Conclusion: New Agenda, and New Client-States for the International Court. Appendices: A. Covenant of the League of Nations (1920), (Art. 12-15, Art. 19). B. Charter of the United Nations (1945), (Chapter XIV. Art. 92-96). C. Statute of the International Court of Justice. D. U.N. General Assembly Resolution 44/23, 9 January 1990. (`United Nations Decade of International Law'). Table of Principal Cases. Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より