How organisations measure success : the use of performance indicators in government
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
How organisations measure success : the use of performance indicators in government
Routledge, 1992
Available at 11 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. [184]-191
Includes indexes
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Throughout the 1980s, the British Civil Service devoted much time and energy to develop indicators to measure the performance of government. Never before had so much stress been placed on accountability and performance, a trend which will be reinforced as government continues to devolve activities to agencies and looks for methods to assess their performance. "How Organizations Measure Success" analyzes existing methods from their origins in the 1960s to their revival in the 1980s as part of the Financial Management Initiative. The authors examine the natural history of performance indicators across a variety of government departments and public agencies as well as private businesses. The case studies include the National Health Service, the Department of Social Security, the police and the courts, as well as a chain of supermarkets and a clearing bank. The findings illuminate problems of both design and implementation and highlight other issues including the implications of performance indicators for democratic accountability.
Table of Contents
1. Revolution or resurrection? The history of a concept. 2. Models, measures and muddles: organizational and conceptual dimensions of performance indicators. 3. The criminal justice system: police, courts, and prisons. 4. The welfare system: social security and the National Health Service. 5. The private sector: banks, building societies, and retail stores. 6. Managing monopolies: railways, water and airports. 7. Performance indicators in the 1990s: tools for managing political and administrative change.
by "Nielsen BookData"