Concepts of free labor in Antebellum America
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Concepts of free labor in Antebellum America
(Yale historical publications)
Yale University Press, c1991
Available at 13 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 309-498) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
An investigation of how Americans - intellectuals, labour reformers, politicians, journalists, capitalists, and manual workers - viewed the intrinsic character of manual labour in the decades before the Civil War. Glickstein focuses on both the intellectual origins of attitudes that distinguished manual from mental activity and on the ways these attitudes were influenced by the mounting sectional conflict over black slave labour and by the tide of industrialization that was sweeping the Western world. He finds that the meanings ascribed to manual work were a complex amalgam of major intellectual traditions, notably those deriving from the Old Testament, classical Greek philosophy, evangelical religion, and classical economics. These meanings not only drew on percpetions of southern slaves, but also on perceptions of various forms of European and immigrant labour as animalistic drudgery; and they were reflected in the enourmous Anglo-American Victorian literature on poverty, mass education, family structure, and working-class unrest.
Glickstein explores how industrial capitalism reinforced the perceived centuries-old division between manual and mental labour, and he examines some of the principal arguments used to justify or rationalize why the most disagreeable work was performed by stigmatized or powerless groups; enslaved and free blacks, immigrants and women.
by "Nielsen BookData"