Society and nature : towards a green social theory
著者
書誌事項
Society and nature : towards a green social theory
(Studies in sociology)
Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992
- : hard
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全37件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
A starting point of this book is Catton and Dunlap's plea for a new ecological paradigm for a post exuberant sociology. What has happened is that a dominant Western worldview has been well established, one which builds on ancient assumptions that people are superior to other species. This assumption was further reinforced during the creation of the social and natural sciences in the 19th century. This dominant Western worldview has four main features. People are seen as fundamentally distinct from all other creatures on earth. Furthermore, they have dominion over these other species. People are masters of their own destiny. They can choose their goals and learn to do whatever is necessary to achieve them. The world and its resources is vast. This provides unlimited opportunities for humans. The history of humanity is one of progress. For every perceived problem there is a solution. Such progress will never cease. The basis of Catton and Dunlap's argument is that all these assumptions are fundamentally unecological. Chapter one of this book largely confirms the new ecological paradigm. In doing so it raises an uncomfortable issue for social theory.
Can sociology respond to contemporary environmental problems in its present state? Chapter two suggests that one of the major reasons why a paradigm of the kind Catton and Dunlap suggest has not been created is that early sociology modelled many of its concepts on biological science. Chapter three outlines a starting-point for a new form of social theory which starts to overcome some of these problems. It is in fact a survey of a type of theory under development by Marx and Engels in the mid 19th century, to the effect that people are a species which, like all other living organisms, have needs like any other species and needs which are specific to human beings. Chapter four argues that, after a number of uncertain starts and misleading developments of Darwinism, there are now real and exciting signs that biological science is developing concepts which are very much in line with the paradigm first outlined by Marx in the 1840s. In particular, the abolition of a rigid distinction between organism and environment is a feature of this new paradigm. Chapter five addresses the central question of culture and human beings' distinct capacities in this regard.
Chapter six draws some of the earlier themes from biology and psychology and combines them with one aspect of contemporary social theory in an attempt to develop a science more sensitive to environmental issues. Chapter seven draws on previously unpublished work in Sussex University's Mass Observation Archive to illustrate some of this book's main themes. Chapter eight discusses how the arguments of this book relate to recent debates within this philosophy of science.
目次
- Science, social science, politics and the environment - some unhelpful dichotomies
- people, nature and social theory
- nature as man's inorganic body - Marx's conceptual framework
- arguments within biology - from neo-Darwinism to the study of organisms and their environments
- nature as alive - social relations and deep mental structures
- spreading man's inorganic body - some implications
- nature reified - a contemporary case study
- society and nature - from theory to practice.
「Nielsen BookData」 より