Theory and practice in archaeology
著者
書誌事項
Theory and practice in archaeology
(Material cultures)
Routledge, 1992
大学図書館所蔵 全9件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In this latest collection of articles, Ian Hodder sets out to deal with new developments in archaeological theory and its application to archaeological data. Seven of the 19 chapters have been specifically written for this volume to act as an overview of the way the archaeological debate has developed over the past ten years. Yet Hodder's brief is wider than mere commentary: he aims to break down the separation of theory and practice and to reconcile the division between the intellectual and the "dirt" archaeologist. Through a series of examples - from excavation and heritage issues to site reports - the book demonstrates that an interpretive archaeology must be applied to archaeological data in order to contribute to modern social practice. Faced with a rapidly diminishing past, archaeology urgently needs a clear image of itself, able to gain funding, win public confidence and save the heritage quickly and professionally. This image, however, is often clouded by the theory/practice debate, a division all too often encouraged by the separation of universities and heritage management. Hodder emphasizes the importance of finding the right balance.
目次
- Theory practice and praxis. Part 1 Symbolic and structural archaeology: symbolism, meaning and context
- symbols in action (1982)
- burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic (1984). Part 2 Some implications of the new ideas: post-processual archaeology
- theoretical archaeology - a reactionary view (1982)
- archaeolgy in 1984 (1984)
- politics and archaeology in the World Archaeological Congress 1986 (1986). Part 3 Debate and re-evaluation: the processual reaction - "you have gone too far"
- towards radical doubt - a dialogue
- the post-processual reaction - "you haven't gone far enough"
- towards a coherent archaeology.
「Nielsen BookData」 より