The dialogue of justice : toward a self-reflective society
著者
書誌事項
The dialogue of justice : toward a self-reflective society
Yale University Press, c1992
- : cloth
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全37件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
- 巻冊次
-
: cloth ISBN 9780300051124
内容説明
People around the world are agitating for democracy and individual rights, but there is no concensus on a theory of liberal democracy that might guide them. What are the first principles of a just society? What political theory should shape public policy in such a society? James Fishkin offers a basis for answering these questions by proposing the ideal of a "self-reflective society" - a political culture in which citizens are able to decide their own fate through unconstrained dialogue. Fishkin offers a critique of liberal theories that do not satisfy the requirements for a self-reflective society. He then explains his own theory of liberalism, showing that the freely self-examining society he advocates can provide the key to issues of political legitimacy and social justice. Fishkin proposes practical applications of his theory that would lead to more participatory democracy. Among these are deliberative opinion polls that would allow ordinary citizens to explore issues directly with candidates before elections, and vouchers that would allow them to organize representation for their interests.
Fishkin examines a range of topics from the perspective of a self-reflective society: utility and its limits, justice between generations, conflicting ideals of democracy, equal opportunity, the connections between theory and public policy, the notion of moral progress and the bases for political obligation.
目次
Acknowledgments List of Illustrations Part One: The Limits of Systematic Justice 1. I introduction 1.2 The Problem of Value 1.3 The Problem of Value Continued: Future Generations 1.4 Structure: Problems of Progress 1.5 Assignment: Conflicting Visions of Equal Opportunity 1.6 Democracy and Progress Part Two: Strategies of Reconstruction 2.1 Criteria for an Acceptable Theory 2.2 Beyond Intuitionism 2.3 Political Thought Experiments 2.4 Category 1: The Quest for Consent 2.5 Category 2: Realistic Hypotheticals 2.6 Category 3: Impartial Decision Procedures 2.7 More on Category 3: Preference, Utility and the Good Part Three: The Ideal of a Self-Reflective Society 3.1 Towards Reconstruction 3.2 The Legitimacy Problem 3.3 Legitimacy and Obligation 3.4 Liberty of Political Culture 3.5 The Conditions of Activist Liberty 3.6 Representation Vouchers and Deliberative Opinion Polls 3.7.
- 巻冊次
-
: pbk ISBN 9780300066395
内容説明
People around the world are agitating for democracy and individual rights, but there is no consensus on a theory of liberal democracy that might guide them. What are the first principles of a just society? What political theory should shape public policy in such a society? In this book, James S. Fishkin offers a new basis for answering these questions by proposing the ideal of a "self-reflective society"-a political culture in which citizens are able to decide their own fate through unconstrained dialogue.
Fishkin offers a comprehensive critique of liberal political theories that do not satisfy the requirements for a self-reflective society. He then explains his own theory of liberalism, showing that the freely self-examining society he advocates can provide the key to issues of political legitimacy and social justice. Fishkin proposes practical applications of his theory that would lead to more participatory democracy. Among these are deliberative opinion polls that would allow ordinary citizens to explore issues directly with candidates before elections, and vouchers that would allow them to organize representation for their interests. Fishkin examines a broad range of topics from the fresh perspective of a self-reflective society: utility and its limits, justice between generations, conflicting ideals of democracy, equal opportunity, the connections between theory and public policy, the notion of moral progress, and the bases for political obligation. His book makes a new contribution to central debates in moral, political, and legal philosophy.
「Nielsen BookData」 より
