Appropriating Shakespeare : contemporary critical quarrels
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Appropriating Shakespeare : contemporary critical quarrels
Yale University Press, 1993
Available at 49 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. [491]-500
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
During the 1970s and 1980s new critical schools of Shakespeare scholarship emerged, each with its own ideology, each convinced that all other approaches are deficient. This book argues that in attempting to appropriate Shakespeare for their own purposes, these schools omit and misrepresent Shakespeare's text - and thus distort it. Brian Vickers describes the iconoclastic attitudes emerging in French criticism of the 1960s that continue to influence literary theory: that language cannot reliably represent reality; that literature cannot represent life; that since no definitive reading is possible, all interpretation is misinterpretation. Vickers shows that these positions have been refuted, and he brings together work in philosophy, linguistics, and literary theory to rehabilitate language and literature. He then surveys the main conflicting schools in Shakespearean and other current literary criticism - deconstructionism, feminism, new historicism, cultural materialism, and psychoanalytic, marxist and Christian interpretations - describing the theoretical basis of each school, both in its own words and in those of its critics.
Evaluating the resulting interpretations of Shakespeare, he shows that each is biased and fragmentary in its own way. The epilogue considers two related issues: the attempt of current literary theory to present itself as a coherent system while at the same time wishing to evade accountability; and the way in which different critical schools "demonize" their rivals, thus adding an intolerant tone to much recent criticism.
Table of Contents
Preface Part One: Critical Theories 1 The Diminution of Language: Saussure to Derrida 2 Creator and Interpreters Part Two: Critical Practices 3 Deconstruction: Undergoing, Overreaching 4 New Historicism: Disaffected Subjects 5 Psychocriticism: Finding the Fault 6 Feminist Stereotypes: Misogyny, Patriachy, Bombast 7 Christians and Marxists: Allegory, Ideology Epilogue: Masters and Demons Notes Bibliography Index.
by "Nielsen BookData"