Words that wound : critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Words that wound : critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment
(New perspectives on law, culture, and society)
Westview Press, 1993
- : cloth
- : pbk
Available at 29 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. 147-151
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
- Volume
-
: cloth ISBN 9780813384276
Description
In this book, the authors, all legal scholars from the tradition of critical race theory start from the experience of injury from racist hate speech and develop a theory of the first amendment that recognizes such injuries. In their critique of "first amendment orthodoxy", the authors argue that only a history of racism can explain why defamation, invasion of privacy and fraud are exempt from free-speech guarantees but racist verbal assault is not.
Table of Contents
- Racist speech and the first amendment - the anti-subordination view, Mari J. Matsuda
- if he hollers let him go - regulating racist speech on campus, Charles R. Lawrence III
- words that wound - a tort action for racial insults, epithets and name calling, Richard Delgado
- beyond racism and misogyny - black feminism and "2 Live Crew", Kimberle Williams Crenshaw.
- Volume
-
: pbk ISBN 9780813384283
Description
Words, like sticks and stones, can assault; they can injure; they can exclude. In this important book, four prominent legal scholars from the tradition of critical race theory draw on the experience of injury from racist hate speech to develop a first amendment interpretation that recognizes such injuries. In their critique of ?first amendment orthodoxy,? the authors argue that only a history of racism can explain why defamation, invasion of privacy, and fraud are exempt from free-speech guarantees while racist and sexist verbal assaults are not.The rising tide of verbal violence on college campuses has increased the intensity of the ?hate speech? debate. This book demonstrates how critical race theory can be brought to bear against both conservative and liberal ideology to motivate a responsible regulation of hate speech. The impact of feminist theory is also evident throughout. The authors have provided a rare and powerful example of the application of critical theory to a real-life problem.This timely and necessary book will be essential reading for those experiencing the conflicts of free-speech issues on campus?students, faculty, administrators, and legislators?as well as for scholars of jurisprudence. It will also be a valuable classroom tool for teachers in political science, sociology, law, education, ethnic studies, and women's studies.
Table of Contents
Introduction -- Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story -- If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus -- Words That Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name Calling -- Beyond Racism and Misogyny: Black Feminism and 2 Live Crew -- Epilogue: Burning Crosses and the R. A. V. Case
by "Nielsen BookData"