Wittgenstein and the grammar of literary experience
著者
書誌事項
Wittgenstein and the grammar of literary experience
University of Georgia Press, c1993
大学図書館所蔵 全12件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [183]-189)
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In "Wittgenstein and the Grammar of Literary Experience", James Guetti makes extensive use of the philosopher's conception of "logical grammar" to address such key problems of literary theory as intention, voice, figurative language, and the question of a basic difference between "ordinary" and literary usage. Although the philosophy of Wittgenstein was not directed primarily at literary or aesthetic problems, Guetti notes, certain of his ideas about language can be directly applied to such problems. Guetti focuses especially on Wittgenstein's fundamental proposition that the meaning of language is in its use - purposive use to some end - and on the distinction Wittgenstein makes between "working" and "idling" language. Guetti uses this distinction to argue that certain literary effects should not be confused with meanings. He also examines Wittgenstein's concept that "grammatical form" is something that expressions may "display" in varying, and not necessarily meaningful ways.
If we regard various literary forms as "grammatical displays", Guetti maintains, we can place their particular dynamics in a new light and understand better the compelling ways in which language engages human beings, apart from its "meaningfulness". Guetti's positions thus contain what amount to a strong counterargument to the Derridean notion of the "play of signification", simply by demonstrating that this "play" is grammatical and not a matter of meaning. Although his work is not a direct attack on deconstruction, Guetti establishes - with reference to a variety of literary texts and to Wittgenstein's philosophy - a conceptual system that can be used to challenge both that theoretical approach and others that may misrepresent literary forms.
「Nielsen BookData」 より